Pith Number
pith:PB57VU2L
pith:2024:PB57VU2LLQGDHQ4ZYQSACPMDTW
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Are LLM-based methods good enough for detecting unfair terms of service?
arxiv:2409.00077 v2 · 2024-08-24 · cs.CL · cs.LG
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{PB57VU2LLQGDHQ4ZYQSACPMDTW}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T09:03:55.923416Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
787bfad34b5c0c33c399c424013d839db2adb352722c237fd01ce51aec5d0a58
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/PB57VU2LLQGDHQ4ZYQSACPMDTW \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 787bfad34b5c0c33c399c424013d839db2adb352722c237fd01ce51aec5d0a58
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "d1c37c802d52da097d5194f98f4e81479704d78802c06e1696fa6ee039a66935",
"cross_cats_sorted": [
"cs.LG"
],
"license": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2024-08-24T09:26:59Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "ab54b1e69006bb3fb9b4df63de2c6370797fa07a95bea9f42b1de9731352d9ae"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2409.00077",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 2
}
}