Pith Number
pith:PLHRRYO3
pith:2025:PLHRRYO3S5OJJG4IPKT7B37GXH
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Can a calibration metric be both testable and actionable?
arxiv:2502.19851 v2 · 2025-02-27 · stat.ME · stat.ML
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{PLHRRYO3S5OJJG4IPKT7B37GXH}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Cited by
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T11:48:23.334363Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
7acf18e1db975c949b887aa7f0efe6b9c8116189de3ccad00d40255af40a946c
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/PLHRRYO3S5OJJG4IPKT7B37GXH \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 7acf18e1db975c949b887aa7f0efe6b9c8116189de3ccad00d40255af40a946c
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "077e92cb16550a9f1cd8040f7ffc6f5acbbcc243f2fc9115d0cdd8dacb5f1f12",
"cross_cats_sorted": [
"stat.ML"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "stat.ME",
"submitted_at": "2025-02-27T07:50:24Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "c5f587f8c2f797c7bc600f74acba28bf79f35f3c9ab236222f7b4043cbff59ec"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2502.19851",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 2
}
}