Pith Number
pith:PWC2Y7BJ
pith:2016:PWC2Y7BJLZ2IDUDIAIVJFMCFOR
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Does Having More Options Mean Harder to Reach Consensus?
arxiv:1606.03686 v2 · 2016-06-12 · physics.soc-ph
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{PWC2Y7BJLZ2IDUDIAIVJFMCFOR}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-18T01:11:58.780672Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
7d85ac7c295e7481d068022a92b0457451ff5263ae5cd7ff53103b426fee56fc
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/PWC2Y7BJLZ2IDUDIAIVJFMCFOR \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 7d85ac7c295e7481d068022a92b0457451ff5263ae5cd7ff53103b426fee56fc
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "f2b08b90752bac0c62421236f17a7b4a4a007194bd870b77efc7e6c517deb5a3",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "physics.soc-ph",
"submitted_at": "2016-06-12T09:13:04Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "169ead0c957bcc9901f4afa8eedbc550dd8c8013f24d719b75b7ec35b8244ac5"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "1606.03686",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 2
}
}