Pith Number
pith:QPVMAPXI
pith:2016:QPVMAPXIE4C5XYUDIKDJTOIO4U
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Do logarithmic proximity measures outperform plain ones in graph clustering?
arxiv:1605.01046 v3 · 2016-05-03 · cs.LG · cs.DM
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{QPVMAPXIE4C5XYUDIKDJTOIO4U}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-18T00:50:31.048105Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
83eac03ee82705dbe283428699b90ee522f83e4c8ecb290913f6db779bfaa428
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/QPVMAPXIE4C5XYUDIKDJTOIO4U \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 83eac03ee82705dbe283428699b90ee522f83e4c8ecb290913f6db779bfaa428
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "c8de4c404665f40c243d5b46bc07a944e35b7dda575428170a6577f05c202e9c",
"cross_cats_sorted": [
"cs.DM"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.LG",
"submitted_at": "2016-05-03T19:52:48Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "efc0ddfafd91cec41604e9a3d1ea27176b1aca8e642258b528e4935392bef7ad"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "1605.01046",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 3
}
}