Pith Number
pith:RKBU2MBN
pith:2020:RKBU2MBNF5JDMGLETXVKPAB4VO
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Multi-label classification: do Hamming loss and subset accuracy really conflict with each other?
arxiv:2011.07805 v1 · 2020-11-16 · cs.LG · stat.ML
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{RKBU2MBNF5JDMGLETXVKPAB4VO}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Cited by
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-07-05T01:51:54.477671Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
8a834d302d2f523619649deaa7803cab9936c0c650e8726a5ae6c1eaf6552e72
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/RKBU2MBNF5JDMGLETXVKPAB4VO \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: 8a834d302d2f523619649deaa7803cab9936c0c650e8726a5ae6c1eaf6552e72
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "49fe23e5046d34e413a37d97e33458510f3507c99cb0228d0e877ccb19508545",
"cross_cats_sorted": [
"stat.ML"
],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.LG",
"submitted_at": "2020-11-16T09:13:16Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "72160f2f0845c347fff402796a2914733854cace5fd146da77aaf8cf6e6212e3"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2011.07805",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}