Pith Number
pith:V5RPKOFV
pith:2016:V5RPKOFVYRK523DW3W3NITAIBW
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Should Algorithms for Random SAT and Max-SAT be Different?
arxiv:1610.00442 v2 · 2016-10-03 · cs.AI
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{V5RPKOFVYRK523DW3W3NITAIBW}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-18T00:01:44.015205Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
af62f538b5c455dd6c76ddb6d44c080d8a23b8ee9d6b0e09026a78dc9c5f99b4
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/V5RPKOFVYRK523DW3W3NITAIBW \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: af62f538b5c455dd6c76ddb6d44c080d8a23b8ee9d6b0e09026a78dc9c5f99b4
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "3444ec7e4b961b52f1f89190eb6af1ea7947978ad0b08b3221d22de3e8cfa6fd",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.AI",
"submitted_at": "2016-10-03T08:30:47Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "2ff48578e61a6c57f7fca8c980a6fbd9c231b1beb989e61c118a13e963e240ca"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "1610.00442",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 2
}
}