Pith Number
pith:WOJFG56G
pith:2026:WOJFG56GWE7UFAAABTNLEONZ57
not attested
not anchored
not stored
refs pending
Can LLMs Use Linguistic Uncertainty Markers to Reliably Reflect Intrinsic Confidence?
arxiv:2605.28778 v1 · 2026-05-27 · cs.CL
Add to your LaTeX paper
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{WOJFG56GWE7UFAAABTNLEONZ57}
Prints a linked badge after your title and injects PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv. Learn more · Embed verified badge
Record completeness
1
Bitcoin timestamp
2
Internet Archive
3
Author claim
· sign in to
claim
4
Citations
5
Replications
✓
Portable graph bundle live · download bundle · merged
state
The bundle contains the canonical record plus signed events. A mirror can host it anywhere and recompute the same
current state with the deterministic merge algorithm.
Receipt and verification
| First computed | 2026-05-28T02:05:02.849591Z |
|---|---|
| Builder | pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1 |
| Signature | Pith Ed25519
(pith-v1-2026-05) · public key |
| Schema | pith-number/v1.0 |
Canonical hash
b3925377c6b13f4280000cdab239b9effa6b0a4a3104e0d64e90308f388780d7
Aliases
· · · · ·Agent API
Verify this Pith Number yourself
curl -sH 'Accept: application/ld+json' https://pith.science/pith/WOJFG56GWE7UFAAABTNLEONZ57 \
| jq -c '.canonical_record' \
| python3 -c "import sys,json,hashlib; b=json.dumps(json.loads(sys.stdin.read()), sort_keys=True, separators=(',',':'), ensure_ascii=False).encode(); print(hashlib.sha256(b).hexdigest())"
# expect: b3925377c6b13f4280000cdab239b9effa6b0a4a3104e0d64e90308f388780d7
Canonical record JSON
{
"metadata": {
"abstract_canon_sha256": "b58eba48c6c47b14b848e5c6f536d3e0c4dfc753e3e239a79a818563459b7f9f",
"cross_cats_sorted": [],
"license": "http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/",
"primary_cat": "cs.CL",
"submitted_at": "2026-05-27T17:38:00Z",
"title_canon_sha256": "9bf979f92dabc49a570ec81a23e7decb32b265bf39e78e02b06d7bbd51fb4c73"
},
"schema_version": "1.0",
"source": {
"id": "2605.28778",
"kind": "arxiv",
"version": 1
}
}