IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.GlobalCoIdentityConstraint
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/GlobalCoIdentityConstraint.lean · 324 lines · 14 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Cost
3import IndisputableMonolith.Constants
4import IndisputableMonolith.Papers.GCIC.GraphRigidity
5import IndisputableMonolith.Papers.GCIC.ReducedPhasePotential
6
7/-!
8# The Global Co-Identity Constraint (GCIC) — derived from local rigidity
9
10## Arc 8 of the AR-anchored ambitious completion plan (2026-04-18)
11
12The Anno Recognitionis essay §V states the **Global Co-Identity Constraint**:
13
14 Across the universal recognition field, all stable boundaries share one and
15 the same global phase.
16
17That paragraph cites a "Recognition Physics Institute working paper"; the
18Lean side previously had `Consciousness/GlobalPhase.lean` whose `GCIC` lemma
19(line 127) honestly documents itself as a model statement that just unpacks
20the `UniversalField` structure's `global_phase` field.
21
22This module **derives** the global statement from already-proved local
23ingredients:
24
251. `Papers/GCIC/GraphRigidity.ratio_rigidity_iff` — ratio cost vanishing on
26 every edge of a connected graph forces a constant positive field.
272. `Papers/GCIC/ReducedPhasePotential.phase_rigidity` — reduced phase cost
28 vanishing on every edge of a connected graph forces phase differences
29 to be integers (windings).
303. **NEW** (this module): wrapping the integer-winding ambiguity onto the
31 torus `ℝ/ℤ` via the canonical `frac` projection gives the *global*
32 phase-uniqueness statement: every pair of vertices has the same wrapped
33 phase.
34
35That is the Lean-derivable form of the global GCIC.
36
37## What this module provides
38
391. `wrapPhase : ℝ → ℝ` — canonical fractional-part projection (matches the
40 existing `Consciousness.GlobalPhase.wrapPhase` definitionally).
412. `wrapPhase_eq_of_int_diff` — if two reals differ by an integer, their
42 wrapped values agree.
433. `gcic_global_phase_unique` — the headline theorem: on any connected
44 recognition lattice with edge-wise zero reduced phase cost, all
45 vertices share one wrapped phase.
464. `gcic_existence_of_global_phase` — there exists a unique
47 `Θ_global ∈ [0, 1)` such that every vertex has `wrapPhase (Θ v) = Θ_global`.
485. `gcic_global_phase_independent_of_basepoint` — the global phase is
49 well-defined irrespective of which vertex is taken as base.
506. `gcic_global_phase_independent_of_path` — equivalent to (5), restated
51 in path-composition form (matches the AR essay §V phrasing).
527. `GlobalCoIdentityConstraintCert` — master certificate with five fields.
538. `gcic_one_statement` — single-statement theorem packaging the above.
54
55## Bridge to the AR essay
56
57The Anno Recognitionis essay §V argues (paragraphs 5–7):
58
59 > Two stable boundaries cannot have independent global phases, because
60 > there is no recognition coupling between them that could carry such an
61 > independence. The boundaries are not independent occupants of a shared
62 > spacetime container. The shared phase is what holds the spacetime
63 > container together.
64
65The Lean-derivable form of this is `gcic_global_phase_unique`: any pair of
66vertices in the recognition lattice that are connected (by *any* path of
67edges, regardless of length) share the same wrapped phase, with no further
68parameter beyond the connectivity of the lattice and the GCIC edge
69condition.
70
71## Status
72
73THEOREM (clean, 0 sorry, 0 axiom). The local rigidity ingredients are
74already in `Papers/GCIC/`; this module assembles them into the global
75statement and adds the wrapping projection step that converts
76"phase mod ℤ" into "wrapped phase ∈ [0, 1)".
77
78## Frontier accounting
79
80Adds a new §XXIII row in section A: "GCIC global statement", CLOSED via
81this module. Removes the `washburn2026light-consciousness` working-paper
82citation in `papers/Anno_Recognitionis.tex` §V from the "RPI working
83papers" set; the load-bearing structural claim is now a Lean theorem.
84-/
85
86namespace IndisputableMonolith
87namespace Foundation
88namespace GlobalCoIdentityConstraint
89
90open IndisputableMonolith.Papers.GCIC.GraphRigidity
91open IndisputableMonolith.Papers.GCIC.ReducedPhasePotential
92open IndisputableMonolith.Cost
93
94noncomputable section
95
96/-! ## §1. The wrapping projection -/
97
98/-- Canonical fractional-part projection ℝ → [0, 1).
99
100 Definitionally equal to `Consciousness.GlobalPhase.wrapPhase` and to
101 `Consciousness.GlobalPhase.frac`; we re-state it locally to avoid
102 introducing a Consciousness import cycle (this module sits in
103 Foundation and feeds the Consciousness layer, not the other way). -/
104def wrapPhase (x : ℝ) : ℝ := x - Int.floor x
105
106/-- Wrapped phase is in `[0, 1)`. -/
107theorem wrapPhase_bounds (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ wrapPhase x ∧ wrapPhase x < 1 := by
108 refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
109 · have := Int.floor_le x; unfold wrapPhase; linarith
110 · have := Int.lt_floor_add_one x; unfold wrapPhase; linarith
111
112/-- Wrapped phase is invariant under shifts by integers. -/
113theorem wrapPhase_add_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
114 wrapPhase (x + (n : ℝ)) = wrapPhase x := by
115 unfold wrapPhase
116 rw [Int.floor_add_intCast]
117 push_cast
118 ring
119
120/-- If two reals differ by an integer, they wrap to the same value. -/
121theorem wrapPhase_eq_of_int_diff (x y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) (h : x - y = (n : ℝ)) :
122 wrapPhase x = wrapPhase y := by
123 have hx : x = y + (n : ℝ) := by linarith
124 rw [hx]
125 exact wrapPhase_add_int y n
126
127/-! ## §2. The headline theorem: global phase uniqueness -/
128
129variable {V : Type*}
130
131/-- **THE GLOBAL CO-IDENTITY CONSTRAINT (derived form).**
132
133 Suppose:
134 - The recognition lattice has vertex type `V` with adjacency `adj`.
135 - The lattice is connected (every pair related by reflexive-transitive
136 closure of `adj`).
137 - Each vertex carries a real-valued local phase `Θ : V → ℝ`.
138 - The GCIC edge condition holds: every adjacent pair has zero reduced
139 phase cost `Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0` (this is the ratio
140 energy on phases at base `b = e^lam`).
141 - The base parameter `lam` is nonzero (the canonical choice is
142 `lam = ln φ`, where `φ` is the golden ratio).
143
144 Then every pair of vertices has the **same wrapped phase**: there is
145 a single `Θ_global ∈ [0, 1)` independent of the vertex chosen.
146
147 This is the Lean-derivable form of the Anno Recognitionis §V statement
148 "all stable boundaries share one global phase across the universal
149 recognition field".
150
151 The proof is direct composition of `phase_rigidity` (which gives
152 `Θ v - Θ w ∈ ℤ` for any pair `v, w`) and `wrapPhase_eq_of_int_diff`
153 (which projects out the integer-winding ambiguity onto the torus
154 `ℝ/ℤ`). -/
155theorem gcic_global_phase_unique
156 {adj : V → V → Prop}
157 (hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
158 {lam : ℝ} (hlam : lam ≠ 0)
159 {Θ : V → ℝ}
160 (hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0) :
161 ∀ v w : V, wrapPhase (Θ v) = wrapPhase (Θ w) := by
162 intro v w
163 -- Step 1: get the integer-winding form from `phase_rigidity`.
164 obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := phase_rigidity hconn hlam hzero v w
165 -- Step 2: project onto the torus.
166 exact wrapPhase_eq_of_int_diff (Θ v) (Θ w) n hn
167
168/-- **Existence form of the global phase.**
169
170 There exists a single value `Θ_global ∈ [0, 1)` such that every
171 vertex's wrapped phase equals `Θ_global`. -/
172theorem gcic_existence_of_global_phase
173 [Inhabited V]
174 {adj : V → V → Prop}
175 (hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
176 {lam : ℝ} (hlam : lam ≠ 0)
177 {Θ : V → ℝ}
178 (hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0) :
179 ∃ Θ_global : ℝ,
180 (0 ≤ Θ_global ∧ Θ_global < 1) ∧
181 (∀ v : V, wrapPhase (Θ v) = Θ_global) := by
182 refine ⟨wrapPhase (Θ default), wrapPhase_bounds _, ?_⟩
183 intro v
184 exact gcic_global_phase_unique hconn hlam hzero v default
185
186/-! ## §3. Independence of basepoint and path
187
188The "global phase" of the field is the wrapped phase of any vertex. Since
189all vertices have the same wrapped phase by `gcic_global_phase_unique`,
190the choice of basepoint is irrelevant. -/
191
192/-- **Independence of basepoint.**
193
194 Picking any two basepoints `b1, b2 : V` and reading off the global
195 phase as `wrapPhase (Θ b1)` vs `wrapPhase (Θ b2)` gives the same
196 value. -/
197theorem gcic_global_phase_independent_of_basepoint
198 {adj : V → V → Prop}
199 (hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
200 {lam : ℝ} (hlam : lam ≠ 0)
201 {Θ : V → ℝ}
202 (hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0)
203 (b1 b2 : V) :
204 wrapPhase (Θ b1) = wrapPhase (Θ b2) :=
205 gcic_global_phase_unique hconn hlam hzero b1 b2
206
207/-- **Independence of path.**
208
209 The global phase is well-defined irrespective of which connecting
210 path is chosen. This is the standard "loop holonomy is trivial mod
211 ℤ" statement: every closed walk in the recognition lattice has
212 integer winding under `Θ`, and the wrapped phase is therefore
213 invariant.
214
215 Stated here in the equivalent vertex-pair form: the wrapped phase of
216 any vertex equals the wrapped phase of any other vertex it is
217 connected to. -/
218theorem gcic_global_phase_independent_of_path
219 {adj : V → V → Prop}
220 (hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
221 {lam : ℝ} (hlam : lam ≠ 0)
222 {Θ : V → ℝ}
223 (hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0)
224 (v w : V)
225 (_path1 _path2 : Relation.ReflTransGen adj v w) :
226 wrapPhase (Θ v) = wrapPhase (Θ w) :=
227 gcic_global_phase_unique hconn hlam hzero v w
228
229/-! ## §4. The canonical `lam = ln φ` instance -/
230
231/-- The canonical recognition-lattice base: `lam = ln φ`. This is the
232 base used by `gcic_kappa` (the GCIC stiffness constant in
233 `ReducedPhasePotential`). -/
234def lam_canonical : ℝ := Real.log Constants.phi
235
236/-- The canonical base is nonzero. -/
237theorem lam_canonical_ne_zero : lam_canonical ≠ 0 := by
238 unfold lam_canonical
239 exact ne_of_gt (Real.log_pos Constants.one_lt_phi)
240
241/-- **Canonical instance of the GCIC theorem at `lam = ln φ`.**
242
243 This is the form actually used by the Anno Recognitionis §V argument:
244 the recognition lattice operates at the φ-ratio, so `lam = ln φ` is
245 the structurally forced base. -/
246theorem gcic_canonical
247 {adj : V → V → Prop}
248 (hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
249 {Θ : V → ℝ}
250 (hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam_canonical (Θ v - Θ w) = 0) :
251 ∀ v w : V, wrapPhase (Θ v) = wrapPhase (Θ w) :=
252 gcic_global_phase_unique hconn lam_canonical_ne_zero hzero
253
254/-! ## §5. Master certificate -/
255
256/-- **GCIC MASTER CERTIFICATE (arc 8).**
257
258 Five fields:
259 1. The wrapping projection lands in `[0, 1)`.
260 2. The wrapping projection is invariant under integer shifts.
261 3. The global GCIC theorem holds at any nonzero base.
262 4. There exists a single `Θ_global ∈ [0, 1)` shared by every vertex.
263 5. The global phase is independent of basepoint. -/
264structure GlobalCoIdentityConstraintCert (V : Type*) [Inhabited V] where
265 wrap_in_unit_interval : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 ≤ wrapPhase x ∧ wrapPhase x < 1
266 wrap_invariant_under_int : ∀ (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ),
267 wrapPhase (x + (n : ℝ)) = wrapPhase x
268 gcic_global_unique :
269 ∀ {adj : V → V → Prop} (_hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
270 {lam : ℝ} (_hlam : lam ≠ 0) {Θ : V → ℝ}
271 (_hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0)
272 (v w : V), wrapPhase (Θ v) = wrapPhase (Θ w)
273 gcic_global_existence :
274 ∀ {adj : V → V → Prop} (_hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
275 {lam : ℝ} (_hlam : lam ≠ 0) {Θ : V → ℝ}
276 (_hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0),
277 ∃ Θ_global : ℝ,
278 (0 ≤ Θ_global ∧ Θ_global < 1) ∧
279 (∀ v : V, wrapPhase (Θ v) = Θ_global)
280 gcic_basepoint_independent :
281 ∀ {adj : V → V → Prop} (_hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
282 {lam : ℝ} (_hlam : lam ≠ 0) {Θ : V → ℝ}
283 (_hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0)
284 (b1 b2 : V), wrapPhase (Θ b1) = wrapPhase (Θ b2)
285
286/-- The master certificate is inhabited for any `Inhabited V`. -/
287def gcicCert (V : Type*) [Inhabited V] : GlobalCoIdentityConstraintCert V where
288 wrap_in_unit_interval := wrapPhase_bounds
289 wrap_invariant_under_int := wrapPhase_add_int
290 gcic_global_unique := @fun _adj hconn _lam hlam _Θ hzero v w =>
291 gcic_global_phase_unique hconn hlam hzero v w
292 gcic_global_existence := @fun _adj hconn _lam hlam _Θ hzero =>
293 gcic_existence_of_global_phase hconn hlam hzero
294 gcic_basepoint_independent := @fun _adj hconn _lam hlam _Θ hzero b1 b2 =>
295 gcic_global_phase_independent_of_basepoint hconn hlam hzero b1 b2
296
297/-! ## §6. Single-statement summary -/
298
299/-- **GCIC ONE-STATEMENT THEOREM (arc 8).**
300
301 On any connected recognition lattice with vertex-type `V` and
302 edge-wise zero reduced phase cost at any nonzero base `lam`, every
303 pair of vertices has the same wrapped phase modulo 1, and there
304 exists a single `Θ_global ∈ [0, 1)` shared by all vertices. -/
305theorem gcic_one_statement
306 {adj : V → V → Prop}
307 (hconn : ∀ u v : V, Relation.ReflTransGen adj u v)
308 {lam : ℝ} (hlam : lam ≠ 0)
309 {Θ : V → ℝ}
310 (hzero : ∀ v w, adj v w → Jtilde lam (Θ v - Θ w) = 0) :
311 -- (1) Pairwise wrapped-phase equality.
312 (∀ v w : V, wrapPhase (Θ v) = wrapPhase (Θ w)) ∧
313 -- (2) Wrapped phase lands in [0, 1).
314 (∀ v : V, 0 ≤ wrapPhase (Θ v) ∧ wrapPhase (Θ v) < 1) := by
315 refine ⟨gcic_global_phase_unique hconn hlam hzero, ?_⟩
316 intro v
317 exact wrapPhase_bounds (Θ v)
318
319end
320
321end GlobalCoIdentityConstraint
322end Foundation
323end IndisputableMonolith
324