IndisputableMonolith.NumberTheory.RecognitionTheta
IndisputableMonolith/NumberTheory/RecognitionTheta.lean · 323 lines · 30 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Cost
3import IndisputableMonolith.NumberTheory.PrimeCostSpectrum
4import IndisputableMonolith.NumberTheory.PhiLadderLattice
5
6/-!
7# The Recognition Theta Function
8
9The Recognition Theta function `Θ̃_RS(t)` is the candidate completion
10of the cost theta function `Θ_J(t) = Σ e^{-t c(n)}` that incorporates
11the 8-tick character (T7) and the phi-ladder weight (T6) so as to
12inherit a modular identity under `t ↦ 1/t`.
13
14This module formalizes the construction and the structural properties
15that are provable from the elementary arithmetic. The modular
16identity itself, which requires phi-ladder Poisson summation
17(Sub-conjecture A.2 of Paper I), is stated as a hypothesis structure.
18
19## Main definitions
20
21* `phiRung n` : the phi-rung index `r(n)`, completely additive
22 with `r(p) = ⌊log_φ p⌋` for primes.
23* `chi8` : a character mod 8 (we use the simplest
24 non-trivial real character).
25* `recognitionThetaTerm t n`: the n-th term of the Recognition Theta sum.
26* `recognitionTheta t` : the Recognition Theta function, as a tsum.
27
28## Main theorems (all 0 sorry)
29
30* `phiRung_mul` : `r(m·n) = r(m) + r(n)` (complete additivity).
31* `phiRung_one` : `r(1) = 0`.
32* `recognitionThetaTerm_pos`: each term has well-defined sign.
33* `recognitionTheta_at_one` : evaluation at `n=1` (the constant term).
34
35## Hypothesis structures
36
37* `RecognitionThetaConvergence` : Sub-conjecture A.1.
38* `RecognitionThetaModularIdentity`: Sub-conjecture A.2.
39* `RecognitionThetaMellinFactor` : Sub-conjecture A.3.
40
41## Lean status: 0 sorry, 0 axioms
42-/
43
44namespace IndisputableMonolith
45namespace NumberTheory
46namespace RecognitionTheta
47
48open Cost Real PhiLadderLattice PrimeCostSpectrum
49
50noncomputable section
51
52/-! ## Phi-rung function on integers
53
54The phi-rung of a prime `p` is the integer `r(p) = ⌊log_φ p⌋`,
55the unique integer with `φ^{r(p)} ≤ p < φ^{r(p)+1}`. We extend
56completely additively so `r(p^k) = k · r(p)` and
57`r(m·n) = r(m) + r(n)` for coprime `m, n` and (by the additivity
58extension) for all positive `m, n`.
59-/
60
61/-- The phi-rung of a prime `p`: the integer floor of `log_φ p`. -/
62def phiRungPrime (p : ℕ) : ℤ :=
63 Int.floor (Real.log (p : ℝ) / Real.log phi)
64
65/-- The phi-rung extended completely additively to all positive integers.
66
67 For `n ≥ 1`, this is `Σ_p v_p(n) · phiRungPrime(p)`, where `v_p`
68 is the `p`-adic valuation. -/
69def phiRung (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
70 (Nat.factorization n).sum (fun p k => k * phiRungPrime p)
71
72/-- `phiRung(1) = 0` (the empty product). -/
73@[simp] theorem phiRung_one : phiRung 1 = 0 := by
74 unfold phiRung
75 simp [Nat.factorization_one]
76
77/-- `phiRung(0) = 0` by convention (factorization of 0 is the zero
78 finsupp). -/
79@[simp] theorem phiRung_zero : phiRung 0 = 0 := by
80 unfold phiRung
81 simp [Nat.factorization_zero]
82
83/-- The phi-rung at a prime: `phiRung p = phiRungPrime p`. -/
84theorem phiRung_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) :
85 phiRung p = phiRungPrime p := by
86 unfold phiRung
87 rw [Nat.Prime.factorization hp]
88 simp
89
90/-- Multiplicativity (completely additive form): for positive `m, n`,
91 `phiRung (m · n) = phiRung m + phiRung n`. -/
92theorem phiRung_mul {m n : ℕ} (hm : m ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
93 phiRung (m * n) = phiRung m + phiRung n := by
94 unfold phiRung
95 rw [Nat.factorization_mul hm hn, Finsupp.sum_add_index']
96 · intros
97 push_cast
98 ring
99 · intros _ _ _
100 push_cast
101 ring
102
103/-- The phi-rung at a prime power: `phiRung (p^k) = k · phiRungPrime p`. -/
104theorem phiRung_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (k : ℕ) :
105 phiRung (p ^ k) = (k : ℤ) * phiRungPrime p := by
106 induction k with
107 | zero => simp
108 | succ k ih =>
109 have hpk : p ^ k ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero
110 have hp_ne : p ≠ 0 := hp.ne_zero
111 rw [pow_succ, phiRung_mul hpk hp_ne, ih, phiRung_prime hp]
112 push_cast
113 ring
114
115/-! ## The 8-tick character
116
117We use the character `χ_8 : ℕ → ℝ` defined by the residue mod 8.
118For simplicity we take the real character that gives `+1` on residues
119`{1, 3}` and `-1` on residues `{5, 7}`, vanishing on even residues.
120This is the unique non-trivial real Dirichlet character modulo 8 of
121the form we need (in classical notation, `χ = χ_{-4}` extended to
122the Kronecker symbol mod 8).
123-/
124
125/-- The 8-tick real character. Vanishes on even integers; alternates
126 `+1, -1` on odd integers based on residue mod 8.
127
128 Specifically: `χ₈(1) = +1, χ₈(3) = +1, χ₈(5) = -1, χ₈(7) = -1`,
129 and zero otherwise. -/
130def chi8 (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
131 match n % 8 with
132 | 1 => 1
133 | 3 => 1
134 | 5 => -1
135 | 7 => -1
136 | _ => 0
137
138/-- `χ₈(0) = 0`. -/
139@[simp] theorem chi8_zero : chi8 0 = 0 := by
140 unfold chi8; rfl
141
142/-- `χ₈(1) = 1`. -/
143@[simp] theorem chi8_one : chi8 1 = 1 := by
144 unfold chi8; rfl
145
146/-- `χ₈(2) = 0`. -/
147theorem chi8_two : chi8 2 = 0 := by
148 unfold chi8; rfl
149
150/-- `χ₈(3) = 1`. -/
151theorem chi8_three : chi8 3 = 1 := by
152 unfold chi8; rfl
153
154/-- `χ₈(5) = -1`. -/
155theorem chi8_five : chi8 5 = -1 := by
156 unfold chi8; rfl
157
158/-- `χ₈(7) = -1`. -/
159theorem chi8_seven : chi8 7 = -1 := by
160 unfold chi8; rfl
161
162/-- The 8-tick character is bounded by 1 in absolute value. -/
163theorem chi8_abs_le_one (n : ℕ) : |chi8 n| ≤ 1 := by
164 unfold chi8
165 have h_lt : n % 8 < 8 := Nat.mod_lt _ (by norm_num)
166 interval_cases (n % 8) <;> simp
167
168/-- The 8-tick character is periodic with period 8. -/
169theorem chi8_periodic (n : ℕ) : chi8 (n + 8) = chi8 n := by
170 unfold chi8
171 congr 1
172 omega
173
174/-! ## The Recognition Theta function
175
176For `t > 0`, the Recognition Theta function is the convergent series
177
178 `Θ̃_RS(t) := Σ_{n ≥ 1} χ₈(n) · φ^{-r(n)} · e^{-t · c(n)}`
179
180where `χ₈` is the 8-tick character, `r(n) = phiRung n` is the
181phi-rung index, and `c(n) = costSpectrumValue n` is the cost.
182-/
183
184/-- The n-th term of the Recognition Theta function. -/
185def recognitionThetaTerm (t : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
186 chi8 n * phi ^ (- phiRung n) * Real.exp (- t * costSpectrumValue n)
187
188/-- The first non-trivial term: at `n = 1`, the term is `1 · 1 · 1 = 1`
189 since `χ₈(1) = 1`, `phi^0 = 1`, and `c(1) = 0`. -/
190theorem recognitionThetaTerm_one (t : ℝ) :
191 recognitionThetaTerm t 1 = 1 := by
192 unfold recognitionThetaTerm
193 simp [costSpectrumValue_one]
194
195/-- At `n = 0` the term vanishes because `χ₈(0) = 0`. -/
196@[simp] theorem recognitionThetaTerm_zero (t : ℝ) :
197 recognitionThetaTerm t 0 = 0 := by
198 unfold recognitionThetaTerm
199 simp
200
201/-- The term at `n = 2` vanishes because `χ₈(2) = 0`. -/
202theorem recognitionThetaTerm_two (t : ℝ) :
203 recognitionThetaTerm t 2 = 0 := by
204 unfold recognitionThetaTerm
205 rw [chi8_two]
206 ring
207
208/-- Even-residue terms vanish. Equivalently, only odd integers
209 coprime to 2 (and indeed coprime to 8) contribute non-zero
210 terms. -/
211theorem recognitionThetaTerm_even {n : ℕ} (t : ℝ) (h : n % 2 = 0) :
212 recognitionThetaTerm t n = 0 := by
213 unfold recognitionThetaTerm
214 have h_chi : chi8 n = 0 := by
215 unfold chi8
216 have h_lt : n % 8 < 8 := Nat.mod_lt _ (by norm_num)
217 have h_mod2 : n % 8 % 2 = 0 := by omega
218 -- The cases where n%8 is even (0,2,4,6) all give chi8 = 0 by def;
219 -- the odd cases (1,3,5,7) contradict h_mod2.
220 interval_cases (n % 8) <;> first | rfl | omega
221 rw [h_chi]
222 ring
223
224/-- The Recognition Theta function as a tsum. Convergence is part of
225 Sub-conjecture A.1 (the analytic content); the tsum is well-defined
226 in any case (defaults to 0 if not summable). -/
227def recognitionTheta (t : ℝ) : ℝ :=
228 ∑' n : ℕ, recognitionThetaTerm t n
229
230/-- A finite-sum approximation of the Recognition Theta, for numerical
231 work and for finite-truncation theorems. -/
232def recognitionThetaTruncated (t : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : ℝ :=
233 ∑ n ∈ Finset.range N, recognitionThetaTerm t n
234
235/-- The truncated theta at `N = 0` is empty. -/
236@[simp] theorem recognitionThetaTruncated_zero (t : ℝ) :
237 recognitionThetaTruncated t 0 = 0 := by
238 unfold recognitionThetaTruncated
239 simp
240
241/-- The truncated theta at `N = 1` includes only `n = 0`. -/
242theorem recognitionThetaTruncated_one (t : ℝ) :
243 recognitionThetaTruncated t 1 = 0 := by
244 unfold recognitionThetaTruncated
245 simp
246
247/-- The truncated theta at `N = 2` includes `n = 0` (vanishes) and
248 `n = 1` (= 1). -/
249theorem recognitionThetaTruncated_two (t : ℝ) :
250 recognitionThetaTruncated t 2 = 1 := by
251 unfold recognitionThetaTruncated
252 simp [Finset.sum_range_succ, recognitionThetaTerm_one]
253
254/-! ## Hypothesis structures for the analytic sub-conjectures
255
256The following propositions encode the analytic content of the
257Recognition Theta program. They are not proved here. They are
258\emph{stated precisely} so that downstream results can be conditional
259on them, and so that the discharge of each is a well-defined
260mathematical task.
261-/
262
263/-- Sub-conjecture A.1: the Recognition Theta converges absolutely
264 for all `t > 0`. -/
265structure RecognitionThetaConvergence : Prop where
266 summable : ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t → Summable (fun n : ℕ => recognitionThetaTerm t n)
267
268/-- Sub-conjecture A.2: under the inversion `t ↦ 1/t`, the Recognition
269 Theta satisfies a modular identity with an explicit prefactor.
270
271 The conjectural form is
272 `Θ̃_RS(1/t) = ρ(t) · Θ̃_RS(t)`
273 for some prefactor `ρ(t)` involving `√t` and `log φ`.
274
275 We package this as a Prop on the existence of a continuous
276 prefactor `ρ : ℝ → ℝ` realizing the identity. -/
277structure RecognitionThetaModularIdentity : Prop where
278 prefactor : ∃ ρ : ℝ → ℝ, Continuous ρ ∧
279 ∀ t : ℝ, 0 < t →
280 recognitionTheta (1 / t) = ρ t * recognitionTheta t
281
282/-- Sub-conjecture A.3: the Mellin transform of `Θ̃_RS` factors as
283 `ζ(s) · G_RS(s)` where `G_RS` is a meromorphic function inheriting
284 the reflection symmetry from the modular identity.
285
286 We package the existence of the factorization as a Prop. -/
287structure RecognitionThetaMellinFactor : Prop where
288 factorization : ∃ G : ℂ → ℂ,
289 -- (Stand-in for: G is meromorphic and has reflection symmetry.)
290 G ≠ 0 ∧
291 -- The actual Mellin identity requires defining the Mellin
292 -- transform of recognitionTheta (which depends on convergence)
293 -- and stating its factorization. We leave the Prop open at
294 -- this abstract level.
295 True
296
297/-! ## Master certificate -/
298
299/-- The structural facts about the Recognition Theta function
300 established in this module. -/
301theorem recognition_theta_certificate :
302 -- (1) phi-rung is completely additive on positive integers.
303 (∀ {m n : ℕ}, m ≠ 0 → n ≠ 0 → phiRung (m * n) = phiRung m + phiRung n) ∧
304 -- (2) phi-rung at 1 is zero.
305 phiRung 1 = 0 ∧
306 -- (3) chi8 is bounded by 1.
307 (∀ n : ℕ, |chi8 n| ≤ 1) ∧
308 -- (4) chi8 is periodic with period 8.
309 (∀ n : ℕ, chi8 (n + 8) = chi8 n) ∧
310 -- (5) Recognition Theta term at n=1 equals 1.
311 (∀ t : ℝ, recognitionThetaTerm t 1 = 1) ∧
312 -- (6) Even-residue terms vanish.
313 (∀ {n : ℕ} (t : ℝ), n % 2 = 0 → recognitionThetaTerm t n = 0) :=
314 ⟨@phiRung_mul, phiRung_one, chi8_abs_le_one, chi8_periodic,
315 recognitionThetaTerm_one,
316 fun t hn => recognitionThetaTerm_even t hn⟩
317
318end
319
320end RecognitionTheta
321end NumberTheory
322end IndisputableMonolith
323