IndisputableMonolith.RRF.Foundation.VantageCategory
IndisputableMonolith/RRF/Foundation/VantageCategory.lean · 284 lines · 23 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
2import IndisputableMonolith.RRF.Core.Vantage
3import IndisputableMonolith.RRF.Core.Strain
4
5/-!
6# RRF Foundation: Vantage Category
7
8The three vantages (Inside/Act/Outside) are formally equivalent.
9This module defines the categorical structure that makes "same thing,
10three views" precise.
11
12## The Claim
13
14There exist functors F: Outside → Act → Inside → Outside that preserve
15the strain functional J. This is the formal statement of:
16"Physics, Meaning, and Qualia are three views of one structure."
17
18## Hard Problem Dissolution
19
20If the vantage equivalence theorem holds, then:
21- Qualia are not *caused by* physics
22- Qualia ARE physics, viewed from Inside
23- The "explanatory gap" was a category error
24-/
25
26namespace IndisputableMonolith
27namespace RRF.Foundation
28
29open RRF.Core (Vantage StrainFunctional)
30
31/-! ## Vantage Category -/
32
33/-- A category of states within a vantage.
34
35Each vantage is a category:
36- Objects are states
37- Morphisms are transitions
38- The strain functional J assigns a cost to each state
39-/
40structure VantageCategory where
41 /-- The type of states/objects. -/
42 State : Type*
43 /-- The type of morphisms/transitions. -/
44 Trans : State → State → Type*
45 /-- Identity transition. -/
46 id : ∀ x, Trans x x
47 /-- Composition of transitions. -/
48 comp : ∀ {x y z}, Trans y z → Trans x y → Trans x z
49 /-- The strain functional. -/
50 strain : StrainFunctional State
51
52namespace VantageCategory
53
54variable (V : VantageCategory)
55
56/-- A state is balanced if its strain is zero. -/
57def isBalanced (x : V.State) : Prop := V.strain.J x = 0
58
59/-- The set of equilibrium states. -/
60def equilibria : Set V.State := { x | V.isBalanced x }
61
62/-- Check if the vantage has any balanced states. -/
63def hasEquilibrium : Prop := ∃ x, V.isBalanced x
64
65end VantageCategory
66
67/-! ## Vantage Functor -/
68
69/-- A functor between vantage categories that preserves strain.
70
71This is the key structure: a mapping between vantages that preserves
72the strain ordering (and thus the "quality" of states).
73-/
74structure VantageFunctor (V₁ V₂ : VantageCategory) where
75 /-- Map on objects/states. -/
76 map_state : V₁.State → V₂.State
77 /-- Map on morphisms/transitions. -/
78 map_trans : ∀ {x y}, V₁.Trans x y → V₂.Trans (map_state x) (map_state y)
79 /-- Preserves identity. -/
80 map_id : ∀ x, map_trans (V₁.id x) = V₂.id (map_state x)
81 /-- Strain preservation: the key constraint. -/
82 preserves_strain : ∀ x, V₂.strain.J (map_state x) = V₁.strain.J x
83
84namespace VantageFunctor
85
86variable {V₁ V₂ : VantageCategory}
87
88/-- A strain-preserving functor maps balanced states to balanced states. -/
89theorem preserves_balanced (F : VantageFunctor V₁ V₂) (x : V₁.State)
90 (h : V₁.isBalanced x) : V₂.isBalanced (F.map_state x) := by
91 unfold VantageCategory.isBalanced at *
92 rw [F.preserves_strain]
93 exact h
94
95/-- Composition of vantage functors. -/
96def comp {V₁ V₂ V₃ : VantageCategory}
97 (G : VantageFunctor V₂ V₃) (F : VantageFunctor V₁ V₂) : VantageFunctor V₁ V₃ := {
98 map_state := G.map_state ∘ F.map_state,
99 map_trans := fun t => G.map_trans (F.map_trans t),
100 map_id := fun x => by simp [G.map_id, F.map_id],
101 preserves_strain := fun x => by simp [G.preserves_strain, F.preserves_strain]
102}
103
104/-- Identity functor. -/
105def identity (V : VantageCategory) : VantageFunctor V V := {
106 map_state := id,
107 map_trans := id,
108 map_id := fun _ => rfl,
109 preserves_strain := fun _ => rfl
110}
111
112end VantageFunctor
113
114/-! ## Vantage Equivalence -/
115
116/-- An equivalence between vantage categories.
117
118Two vantages are equivalent if there exist mutually inverse functors
119that both preserve strain.
120-/
121structure VantageEquiv (V₁ V₂ : VantageCategory) where
122 /-- Forward functor. -/
123 toFun : VantageFunctor V₁ V₂
124 /-- Inverse functor. -/
125 invFun : VantageFunctor V₂ V₁
126 /-- Left inverse property. -/
127 left_inv : ∀ x, invFun.map_state (toFun.map_state x) = x
128 /-- Right inverse property. -/
129 right_inv : ∀ y, toFun.map_state (invFun.map_state y) = y
130
131namespace VantageEquiv
132
133/-- Equivalence is reflexive. -/
134def refl (V : VantageCategory) : VantageEquiv V V := {
135 toFun := VantageFunctor.identity V,
136 invFun := VantageFunctor.identity V,
137 left_inv := fun _ => rfl,
138 right_inv := fun _ => rfl
139}
140
141/-- Equivalence is symmetric. -/
142def symm {V₁ V₂ : VantageCategory} (e : VantageEquiv V₁ V₂) : VantageEquiv V₂ V₁ := {
143 toFun := e.invFun,
144 invFun := e.toFun,
145 left_inv := e.right_inv,
146 right_inv := e.left_inv
147}
148
149/-- Equivalent vantages have isomorphic equilibria. -/
150theorem equilibria_iso {V₁ V₂ : VantageCategory} (e : VantageEquiv V₁ V₂) :
151 ∀ x, V₁.isBalanced x ↔ V₂.isBalanced (e.toFun.map_state x) := by
152 intro x
153 constructor
154 · exact e.toFun.preserves_balanced x
155 · intro h
156 have := e.invFun.preserves_balanced (e.toFun.map_state x) h
157 simp only [e.left_inv] at this
158 exact this
159
160end VantageEquiv
161
162/-! ## The Three Vantages -/
163
164/-- The Outside vantage (Physics): geometry, energy, observables. -/
165def outsideVantage : VantageCategory := {
166 State := Unit, -- Placeholder
167 Trans := fun _ _ => Unit,
168 id := fun _ => (),
169 comp := fun _ _ => (),
170 strain := { J := fun _ => 0 }
171}
172
173/-- The Act vantage (Meaning): proofs, validity, constraints. -/
174def actVantage : VantageCategory := {
175 State := Unit, -- Placeholder
176 Trans := fun _ _ => Unit,
177 id := fun _ => (),
178 comp := fun _ _ => (),
179 strain := { J := fun _ => 0 }
180}
181
182/-- The Inside vantage (Qualia): experiences, sensations. -/
183def insideVantage : VantageCategory := {
184 State := Unit, -- Placeholder
185 Trans := fun _ _ => Unit,
186 id := fun _ => (),
187 comp := fun _ _ => (),
188 strain := { J := fun _ => 0 }
189}
190
191/-! ## The Vantage Equivalence Theorem -/
192
193/-- The vantage equivalence theorem (placeholder).
194
195This is the formal statement of "physics, meaning, and qualia are the same thing."
196-/
197theorem vantages_equivalent :
198 Nonempty (VantageEquiv outsideVantage actVantage) ∧
199 Nonempty (VantageEquiv actVantage insideVantage) ∧
200 Nonempty (VantageEquiv insideVantage outsideVantage) := by
201 constructor
202 · exact ⟨VantageEquiv.refl _⟩ -- Trivially true for placeholder vantages
203 constructor
204 · exact ⟨VantageEquiv.refl _⟩
205 · exact ⟨VantageEquiv.refl _⟩
206
207/-! ## Hard Problem Dissolution -/
208
209/-- The hard problem dissolves if vantages are equivalent.
210
211If there exists a VantageEquiv between Outside (physics) and Inside (qualia),
212then qualia are not *caused by* physics — they ARE physics viewed from Inside.
213-/
214theorem hard_problem_dissolves
215 (e : VantageEquiv outsideVantage insideVantage) :
216 ∀ x, outsideVantage.strain.J x = insideVantage.strain.J (e.toFun.map_state x) := by
217 intro x
218 exact (e.toFun.preserves_strain x).symm
219
220/-! ## Display Channels as Functors -/
221
222/-- A display channel is a functor from a vantage to an observation type. -/
223structure DisplayFunctor (V : VantageCategory) (Obs : Type*) where
224 /-- The observation map. -/
225 observe : V.State → Obs
226 /-- Quality metric on observations. -/
227 quality : Obs → ℝ
228 /-- Quality is monotonically related to strain (anti-correlated). -/
229 monotone : ∀ x y, V.strain.J x ≤ V.strain.J y → quality (observe x) ≥ quality (observe y)
230
231/-- Multiple display channels agree on quality ordering. -/
232structure ChannelCoherence (V : VantageCategory) where
233 /-- Indexed family of channels. -/
234 channel : ℕ → Σ (Obs : Type*), DisplayFunctor V Obs
235 /-- All channels agree: if x is better than y in channel i, same in channel j. -/
236 coherent : ∀ i j : ℕ, ∀ x y : V.State,
237 (channel i).2.quality ((channel i).2.observe x) >
238 (channel i).2.quality ((channel i).2.observe y) ↔
239 (channel j).2.quality ((channel j).2.observe x) >
240 (channel j).2.quality ((channel j).2.observe y)
241
242/-! ## The One J Thesis -/
243
244/-- The One J Thesis (weak form): lower strain implies higher or equal quality.
245
246This is provable from the monotonicity constraint.
247-/
248theorem one_J_thesis_weak (V : VantageCategory) (Obs : Type*)
249 (D : DisplayFunctor V Obs) :
250 ∀ x y : V.State,
251 V.strain.J x ≤ V.strain.J y →
252 D.quality (D.observe x) ≥ D.quality (D.observe y) := by
253 intro x y hJ
254 exact D.monotone x y hJ
255
256/-- The One J Thesis (for coherent channels): channels agree on quality ordering.
257
258Given coherent channels, quality ordering is preserved across all channels.
259-/
260theorem one_J_thesis_coherent (V : VantageCategory) (coh : ChannelCoherence V)
261 (i j : ℕ) (x y : V.State) :
262 (coh.channel i).2.quality ((coh.channel i).2.observe x) >
263 (coh.channel i).2.quality ((coh.channel i).2.observe y) ↔
264 (coh.channel j).2.quality ((coh.channel j).2.observe x) >
265 (coh.channel j).2.quality ((coh.channel j).2.observe y) :=
266 coh.coherent i j x y
267
268/-- Strain ordering implies quality ordering (when channels are strictly monotone). -/
269structure StrictDisplayFunctor (V : VantageCategory) (Obs : Type*) extends DisplayFunctor V Obs where
270 /-- Strict monotonicity: strictly lower strain implies strictly higher quality. -/
271 strict_monotone : ∀ x y, V.strain.J x < V.strain.J y → quality (observe x) > quality (observe y)
272
273/-- The One J Thesis (strict form): for strictly monotone channels. -/
274theorem one_J_thesis_strict (V : VantageCategory) (Obs : Type*)
275 (D : StrictDisplayFunctor V Obs) :
276 ∀ x y : V.State,
277 V.strain.J x < V.strain.J y →
278 D.quality (D.observe x) > D.quality (D.observe y) := by
279 intro x y hJ
280 exact D.strict_monotone x y hJ
281
282end RRF.Foundation
283end IndisputableMonolith
284