IndisputableMonolith.Verification.CPT.ForcedFactorization
IndisputableMonolith/Verification/CPT/ForcedFactorization.lean · 296 lines · 19 declarations
show as:
view math explainer →
1import Mathlib
2import IndisputableMonolith.Cost
3import IndisputableMonolith.Verification.CPT.Core
4
5/-!
6# CPT Forced Factorization (Hypothesis-Explicit Lean Layer)
7
8This module captures the strongest currently defensible Lean shape for the paper's
9forced-factorization claims:
10
11- ratio-induced canonical cost scaffold,
12- certificate hypotheses stated explicitly,
13- existence of a reparametrization on the realized cost image,
14- state-independence only under an explicit rigidity hypothesis.
15
16No hidden assumptions are used.
17-/
18
19namespace IndisputableMonolith
20namespace Verification
21namespace CPT
22namespace ForcedFactorization
23
24open scoped Classical
25
26variable {S O : Type}
27
28/-- Ratio-cost scaffold used by CPT factorization statements. -/
29structure RatioCostSpace (S O : Type) where
30 iotaS : S → ℝ
31 iotaO : O → ℝ
32 iotaS_pos : ∀ s : S, 0 < iotaS s
33 iotaO_pos : ∀ o : O, 0 < iotaO o
34
35namespace RatioCostSpace
36
37/-- Ratio coordinate entering the canonical reciprocal cost. -/
38noncomputable def ratio (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (s : S) (o : O) : ℝ :=
39 R.iotaS s / R.iotaO o
40
41/-- Canonical ratio-induced cost used in CPT factorization arguments. -/
42noncomputable def canonicalCost (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (s : S) (o : O) : ℝ :=
43 IndisputableMonolith.Cost.Jcost (ratio R s o)
44
45/-- Realized image of the canonical cost on `S × O`. -/
46def CostImage (R : RatioCostSpace S O) : Set ℝ :=
47 Set.range (fun p : S × O => canonicalCost R p.1 p.2)
48
49/-- Encoded realized-cost coordinate used for reparametrization witnesses. -/
50abbrev CostCode (R : RatioCostSpace S O) := {t : ℝ // t ∈ CostImage R}
51
52end RatioCostSpace
53
54open RatioCostSpace
55
56/-- Explicit assumptions used for the factorization and monotone reparametrization layer. -/
57structure CertificateHypotheses
58 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ) : Prop where
59 /-- Ratio-level dependence: equal ratio coordinate implies equal certificate value. -/
60 depends_on_ratio :
61 ∀ {s1 s2 : S} {o1 o2 : O},
62 ratio R s1 o1 = ratio R s2 o2 → C s1 o1 = C s2 o2
63 /-- Cost-level dependence (stronger; used for image reparametrization existence). -/
64 depends_on_cost :
65 ∀ {s1 s2 : S} {o1 o2 : O},
66 canonicalCost R s1 o1 = canonicalCost R s2 o2 → C s1 o1 = C s2 o2
67 /-- Monotonicity in the canonical cost ordering for fixed `s`. -/
68 monotone_in_cost :
69 ∀ (s : S) (o1 o2 : O),
70 canonicalCost R s o1 ≤ canonicalCost R s o2 → C s o1 ≤ C s o2
71
72/-- Explicit rigidity bundle used to force independence from the state variable. -/
73structure RigidityHypotheses
74 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ) : Prop where
75 independent_of_state : ∀ (s1 s2 : S) (o : O), C s1 o = C s2 o
76
77/-- More primitive hypothesis bundle for the cost-reparametrization layer.
78`depends_on_cost` is derived from ratio-level dependence plus a cost-to-ratio bridge. -/
79structure PrimitiveCertificateHypotheses
80 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ) : Prop where
81 depends_on_ratio :
82 ∀ {s1 s2 : S} {o1 o2 : O},
83 ratio R s1 o1 = ratio R s2 o2 → C s1 o1 = C s2 o2
84 ratio_of_cost_eq :
85 ∀ {s1 s2 : S} {o1 o2 : O},
86 canonicalCost R s1 o1 = canonicalCost R s2 o2 →
87 ratio R s1 o1 = ratio R s2 o2
88 monotone_in_cost :
89 ∀ (s : S) (o1 o2 : O),
90 canonicalCost R s o1 ≤ canonicalCost R s o2 → C s o1 ≤ C s o2
91
92/-- Primitive rigidity hypothesis phrased at ratio level:
93for fixed `o`, ratios collapse across states. -/
94structure PrimitiveRigidityHypotheses
95 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) : Prop where
96 ratio_state_collapse : ∀ (s1 s2 : S) (o : O), ratio R s1 o = ratio R s2 o
97
98theorem primitive_to_certificate
99 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
100 (hPrim : PrimitiveCertificateHypotheses R C) :
101 CertificateHypotheses R C := by
102 refine
103 { depends_on_ratio := hPrim.depends_on_ratio
104 depends_on_cost := ?_
105 monotone_in_cost := hPrim.monotone_in_cost }
106 intro s1 s2 o1 o2 hCost
107 exact hPrim.depends_on_ratio (hPrim.ratio_of_cost_eq hCost)
108
109theorem primitive_to_rigidity
110 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
111 (hPrim : PrimitiveCertificateHypotheses R C)
112 (hRigPrim : PrimitiveRigidityHypotheses R) :
113 RigidityHypotheses R C := by
114 refine
115 { independent_of_state := ?_ }
116 intro s1 s2 o
117 exact hPrim.depends_on_ratio (hRigPrim.ratio_state_collapse s1 s2 o)
118
119theorem certificate_depends_on_ratio
120 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
121 (h : CertificateHypotheses R C) :
122 ∀ {s1 s2 : S} {o1 o2 : O},
123 ratio R s1 o1 = ratio R s2 o2 → C s1 o1 = C s2 o2 :=
124 h.depends_on_ratio
125
126/-- Existence of a reparametrization on the realized cost image.
127The codomain is `CostCode R` to avoid overclaiming global surjectivity onto `ℝ`. -/
128theorem exists_monotone_reparam
129 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
130 (h : CertificateHypotheses R C) :
131 ∃ φ : CostCode R → ℝ,
132 (∀ s o,
133 C s o =
134 φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o, ⟨(s, o), rfl⟩⟩)
135 ∧
136 (∀ s o1 o2,
137 canonicalCost R s o1 ≤ canonicalCost R s o2 →
138 φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o1, ⟨(s, o1), rfl⟩⟩
139 ≤
140 φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o2, ⟨(s, o2), rfl⟩⟩) := by
141 classical
142 let φ : CostCode R → ℝ := fun t =>
143 let p : S × O := Classical.choose t.2
144 C p.1 p.2
145 refine ⟨φ, ?_, ?_⟩
146 · intro s o
147 let t : CostCode R := ⟨canonicalCost R s o, ⟨(s, o), rfl⟩⟩
148 have ht :
149 canonicalCost R (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 = t.1 :=
150 Classical.choose_spec t.2
151 have hcost :
152 canonicalCost R s o =
153 canonicalCost R (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 := by
154 simpa [t] using ht.symm
155 have hdep :
156 C s o = C (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 :=
157 h.depends_on_cost hcost
158 simpa [φ, t] using hdep
159 · intro s o1 o2 hle
160 have hrepr1 :
161 C s o1 = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o1, ⟨(s, o1), rfl⟩⟩ := by
162 simpa using (show C s o1 = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o1, ⟨(s, o1), rfl⟩⟩ from by
163 let t : CostCode R := ⟨canonicalCost R s o1, ⟨(s, o1), rfl⟩⟩
164 have ht :
165 canonicalCost R (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 = t.1 :=
166 Classical.choose_spec t.2
167 have hcost :
168 canonicalCost R s o1 =
169 canonicalCost R (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 := by
170 simpa [t] using ht.symm
171 have hdep :
172 C s o1 = C (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 :=
173 h.depends_on_cost hcost
174 simpa [φ, t] using hdep)
175 have hrepr2 :
176 C s o2 = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o2, ⟨(s, o2), rfl⟩⟩ := by
177 simpa using (show C s o2 = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o2, ⟨(s, o2), rfl⟩⟩ from by
178 let t : CostCode R := ⟨canonicalCost R s o2, ⟨(s, o2), rfl⟩⟩
179 have ht :
180 canonicalCost R (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 = t.1 :=
181 Classical.choose_spec t.2
182 have hcost :
183 canonicalCost R s o2 =
184 canonicalCost R (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 := by
185 simpa [t] using ht.symm
186 have hdep :
187 C s o2 = C (Classical.choose t.2).1 (Classical.choose t.2).2 :=
188 h.depends_on_cost hcost
189 simpa [φ, t] using hdep)
190 calc
191 φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o1, ⟨(s, o1), rfl⟩⟩ = C s o1 := by simpa using hrepr1.symm
192 _ ≤ C s o2 := h.monotone_in_cost s o1 o2 hle
193 _ = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o2, ⟨(s, o2), rfl⟩⟩ := by simpa using hrepr2
194
195/-- Uniqueness of the realized-cost reparametrization:
196if a profile `φ` represents all certificate values on `CostCode R`, it is uniquely determined. -/
197theorem existsUnique_cost_reparam
198 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
199 (h : CertificateHypotheses R C) :
200 ∃! φ : CostCode R → ℝ, ∀ s o,
201 C s o = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o, ⟨(s, o), rfl⟩⟩ := by
202 rcases exists_monotone_reparam R C h with ⟨φ0, hrepr0, _hmono0⟩
203 refine ⟨φ0, hrepr0, ?_⟩
204 intro φ hrepr
205 funext t
206 rcases t with ⟨r, hr⟩
207 rcases hr with ⟨p, hp⟩
208 rcases p with ⟨s, o⟩
209 have hcode :
210 (⟨canonicalCost R s o, ⟨(s, o), rfl⟩⟩ : CostCode R) = ⟨r, ⟨(s, o), hp⟩⟩ := by
211 apply Subtype.ext
212 simp [hp]
213 have hrepr0' : C s o = φ0 ⟨r, ⟨(s, o), hp⟩⟩ := by
214 simpa [hcode] using hrepr0 s o
215 have hrepr' : C s o = φ ⟨r, ⟨(s, o), hp⟩⟩ := by
216 simpa [hcode] using hrepr s o
217 calc
218 φ ⟨r, ⟨(s, o), hp⟩⟩ = C s o := by simpa using hrepr'.symm
219 _ = φ0 ⟨r, ⟨(s, o), hp⟩⟩ := by simpa using hrepr0'
220
221/-- Rigidity consequence: if certificate values are state-independent by hypothesis,
222there exists a single state-free profile `ψ` representing all `C s _`. -/
223theorem phi_independent_of_state
224 [Inhabited S]
225 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
226 (hRig : RigidityHypotheses R C) :
227 ∃ ψ : O → ℝ, ∀ s o, C s o = ψ o := by
228 refine ⟨fun o => C (default : S) o, ?_⟩
229 intro s o
230 exact hRig.independent_of_state s default o
231
232/-- Uniqueness of the state-free profile under explicit rigidity:
233the profile `ψ : O → ℝ` is uniquely determined by certificate values. -/
234theorem existsUnique_state_profile
235 [Inhabited S]
236 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
237 (hRig : RigidityHypotheses R C) :
238 ∃! ψ : O → ℝ, ∀ s o, C s o = ψ o := by
239 refine ⟨fun o => C (default : S) o, ?_, ?_⟩
240 · intro s o
241 exact hRig.independent_of_state s default o
242 · intro ψ hψ
243 funext o
244 exact (hψ default o).symm
245
246/-- Assembled forced-factorization statement at the current maximal claim-honest level:
247cost-image reparametrization + (optional) state-independence under explicit rigidity. -/
248theorem forced_factorization
249 [Inhabited S]
250 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
251 (h : CertificateHypotheses R C)
252 (hRig : RigidityHypotheses R C) :
253 ∃ φ : CostCode R → ℝ,
254 (∀ s o,
255 C s o = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o, ⟨(s, o), rfl⟩⟩)
256 ∧
257 (∃ ψ : O → ℝ, ∀ s o, C s o = ψ o) := by
258 rcases exists_monotone_reparam R C h with ⟨φ, hrepr, _hmono⟩
259 rcases phi_independent_of_state R C hRig with ⟨ψ, hψ⟩
260 exact ⟨φ, hrepr, ⟨ψ, hψ⟩⟩
261
262/-- Strongest bundled statement currently proved:
263both the cost-image reparametrization and the state-free profile are unique
264under explicit hypothesis bundles. -/
265theorem forced_factorization_unique
266 [Inhabited S]
267 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
268 (h : CertificateHypotheses R C)
269 (hRig : RigidityHypotheses R C) :
270 (∃! φ : CostCode R → ℝ,
271 ∀ s o, C s o = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o, ⟨(s, o), rfl⟩⟩)
272 ∧
273 (∃! ψ : O → ℝ, ∀ s o, C s o = ψ o) := by
274 constructor
275 · exact existsUnique_cost_reparam R C h
276 · exact existsUnique_state_profile R C hRig
277
278/-- Strong forced-factorization theorem from primitive ratio-level assumptions. -/
279theorem forced_factorization_unique_of_primitives
280 [Inhabited S]
281 (R : RatioCostSpace S O) (C : S → O → ℝ)
282 (hPrim : PrimitiveCertificateHypotheses R C)
283 (hRigPrim : PrimitiveRigidityHypotheses R) :
284 (∃! φ : CostCode R → ℝ,
285 ∀ s o, C s o = φ ⟨canonicalCost R s o, ⟨(s, o), rfl⟩⟩)
286 ∧
287 (∃! ψ : O → ℝ, ∀ s o, C s o = ψ o) := by
288 exact forced_factorization_unique R C
289 (primitive_to_certificate R C hPrim)
290 (primitive_to_rigidity R C hPrim hRigPrim)
291
292end ForcedFactorization
293end CPT
294end Verification
295end IndisputableMonolith
296