IndisputableMonolith.ClassicalBridge.Fluids.Bridge
The ClassicalBridge.Fluids.Bridge module assembles the specification-level interfaces that connect Recognition Science to Navier-Stokes fluids. It coordinates a discrete state model, a spatial LNAL voxel-field semantics, and a CPM instantiation without selecting any concrete discretization. Researchers building fluid models inside the RS framework cite this bundle as the organizing contract before implementation work begins. The module is purely declarative and contains no theorems or proofs.
claimThe RS↔NS fluids bridge specification at the interface level, consisting of the discrete Navier-Stokes state interface, the spatial array of (Reg6 × Aux5) voxels, and the CPM instantiation with defectMass, orthoMass, energyGap and the A/B/C inequalities.
background
Recognition Science derives all physics from one functional equation whose classical limit must recover continuum equations such as Navier-Stokes. The ClassicalBridge.Fluids subdomain supplies the minimal contracts needed to instantiate the domain-agnostic CPM core for fluids. The three imported modules define those contracts: Discrete supplies the abstract discrete NS state without choosing Galerkin or grid methods; LNAL extends the single-voxel VM to a spatial field; CPM requires concrete functionals (defectMass, orthoMass, energyGap, tests) together with proofs of the required inequalities.
proof idea
This is a definition module, no proofs. It consists solely of three import statements that bring the Discrete, LNAL and CPM interface modules into scope under a single bundle name.
why it matters in Recognition Science
The module supplies the top-level specification contract for the fluids portion of the ClassicalBridge. It feeds any later concrete implementation that will discharge the CPM inequalities and relate the discrete state to the LNAL spatial semantics. The sibling RSNSBridgeSpec is the natural next consumer of this bundle.
scope and limits
- Does not select or prove correctness of any particular discretization (Galerkin, finite-volume, etc.).
- Does not supply the concrete defectMass, orthoMass or energyGap functionals.
- Does not prove the CPM inequalities A, B or C.
- Does not define the full spatial execution semantics beyond the interface signature.