Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.LedgerToFactorization

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Bridge from the free recognition ledger floor to the factorization gate of B2 closure. Monotone (and antitone) additive real maps are linear, replacing continuity in the additive Cauchy step; ledger posting is packaged as primitive, free, discrete, and rational combiner semantics that force affine linear response. Downstream composition-to-J work imports this bridge. The module is a chain of classical regularity lemmas plus semantic embeddings.

claimMonotone additive maps $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ are $\mathbb{R}$-linear (likewise antitone). Primitive, free, discrete, and rational ledger-posting semantics force an affine linear response of the combiner in its second argument, connecting the recognition ledger floor to factorization forcing.

background

RecognitionLedgerFloor supplies the free additive cost floor that closes the two genuine T-1/T0 audit gaps (the Anil critique), rather than restating two-state minimality. FactorizationForcing is the algebraic core of the B2 program: once factorization plus three-way compatibility yield that the combiner is affine in its second argument, the remaining forcing is pure algebra.

This module sits between those layers. It treats order regularity as a stand-in for the usual continuity gate on additive Cauchy solutions over the reals, then defines ledger posting at several structure levels (primitive postings, free combiners, discrete and rational refinements) so that the ledger's additive bookkeeping becomes the linear response the factorization gate consumes.

Sibling content centers on LedgerLinearResponse and the forcing arrows from primitive posting to right-posted additivity, free combiner semantics, and natural affine response.

proof idea

Classical regularity first: monotone additive real maps are linear; antitone additive maps are linear; additive maps nonnegative on the nonnegative reals are monotone. Those lemmas replace a continuity hypothesis in the additive Cauchy step.

Semantic ladder next: PrimitiveLedgerPostingSemantics is the base posting interface; freeLedgerCombinerSemantics_from_primitiveLedgerPosting lifts it to FreeLedgerCombinerSemantics; discrete and rational posting semantics refine the same story. Forcing theorems show primitive posting forces right-posted additivity, and discrete posting forces a natural affine response (LedgerLinearResponse). The module is therefore regularity lemmas plus a chain of semantic embeddings into the factorization setting.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Direct parent is LedgerCompositionToJCost (Phase 3 endpoint). That module exists because law_of_logic_forces_jcost previously assumed SatisfiesCompositionLaw F rather than deriving it from the recognition ledger; it closes the gap structurally so ledger composition forces the recognition cost $J$.

Without the linear-response bridge here, FactorizationForcing cannot attach to RecognitionLedgerFloor, and the composition law (RCL) never becomes a theorem about actual ledger postings. In the broader forcing chain this is infrastructure toward T5 J-uniqueness, $J(x)=(x+x^{-1})/2-1$, not a substitute for it. It is the order-regular path from additive ledger bookkeeping to the affine combiner the B2 algebra needs.

scope and limits

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (2)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (46)