IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.RecognitionDualEntryEnrichment4DAudit
Audit module for the 4D dual-entry signed-source enrichment stack in Recognition gravity. It pulls in the Wave B residual R3 enrichment layer and the R4 mesh dual-entry constitutive coupling, so a referee can check that the signed-source schema and DeficitSourceConstitutiveCoupling assembly sit together without extra hypotheses. Citation target for anyone closing the QG Wave B residual DAG. Structure is import-and-assemble, not a new proof engine.
claimAudit package for the 4D dual-entry enrichment: the signed-source enrichment state (dual-entry strain, no $x$-ratio) together with the mesh dual-entry constitutive coupling that links geometric deficit, hinge $\kappa$, and source-dominated regimes into an inhabited $DeficitSourceConstitutiveCoupling$ witness.
background
Recognition Science gravity analysis treats residual gaps in a typed DAG from the QG full-completion plan. Wave B residual R3 builds a dual-entry signed-source enrichment schema without an $x$-ratio parameter: a strain state that records two entry channels for source terms. Wave B residual R4 then assembles banked pieces R1 (mesh geometric deficit), R2 (mesh hinge $\kappa$ plus source-dominated regime), and R3 (dual-entry strain state) into a constitutive coupling between deficit and source.
This module sits one layer above those two analysis files. It does not redefine J-cost, the $\phi$-ladder, or the eight-tick octave; it only re-exports and co-locates the 4D enrichment and mesh-coupling developments so the residual chain can be audited as a single unit.
Upstream docs frame R3 as the attack on TypedResidual_signed_source_enrichment_schema and R4 as the attack on TypedResidual_DeficitSourceConstitutiveCoupling_from_enrichment. The audit module is the joint checkpoint for that pair.
proof idea
Definition and import module, not a standalone theorem engine. It imports the dual-entry enrichment development and the mesh dual-entry coupling development, then exposes their joint interface for residual closure checks. Any inhabited coupling or enrichment witness is proved in the upstream modules; here the argument is structural co-location so R3 and R4 can be reviewed together against the Wave B residual DAG draft.
why it matters in Recognition Science
Closes the bookkeeping gap between signed-source enrichment and mesh constitutive coupling in the gravity analysis stack. Downstream consumers (none wired in the current graph) would cite this when discharging Wave B residuals R3 and R4 from the QG residual DAG plan. In the broader RS picture it supports the gravity side of the recognition mesh without touching the T0–T8 forcing chain, RCL, or the $\alpha$ band directly. Its value is auditability: one place to confirm the dual-entry 4D path is fully assembled before higher residual layers depend on it.
scope and limits
- Does not prove new enrichment or coupling theorems; those live upstream.
- Does not introduce x-ratio parameters or alter the R3 no-xRatio design.
- Does not derive Newtonian or GR limits from the dual-entry state.
- Does not touch T5–T8 forcing, RCL identities, or mass-ladder claims.
- Does not list downstream users; the current used-by graph is empty.