Pith. sign in
module module high

IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.SRSConvergesScope4D

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Scoped 4D analysis of what the SRS mesh-limit actually hits: the Regge-normalized Einstein–Hilbert face, not the bare EH face. Records the closed-form limit value, proves inequality of the two faces, and packages the Arc-2 Step-8 verdict that the geometric-fold/dictionary collision is real. Gravity auditors cite it when reading the weak-field quadratic recovery chain.

claimIn 4D weak-field TT kinematics, the SRS mesh sequence converges to the Regge face $v_{\mathrm{SRS}}=\rho\,v_{\mathrm{EH}}$ with Regge normalization $\rho=1/2$, hence $v_{\mathrm{SRS}}\neq v_{\mathrm{EH}}$. The mesh does not converge to the bare EH face; the geometric-fold versus dictionary gap of exactly two is therefore a genuine collision, summarized by a scoped Step-8 verdict.

background

Arc 2 of the gravity analysis separates coefficient matching from limit identification. Step 7 fixed the Einstein–Hilbert transverse-traceless second variation at $-1/4$ per unit Frobenius and momentum, and pinned Regge’s normalization $\rho=1/2$, so the banked dictionary value $-1/8$ is exactly the second variation of the Regge action. That closed the coefficient question; it said nothing about which face the discrete convergence theorem lands on.

This module sits between the named closers in SRSConvergesEH4D (edge TT decomposition and the $S_{\mathrm{RS}}\to\mathrm{EH}$ 4D statement) and the geometric-hinge comparison. It introduces 4D matrix and wave carriers, the closed-form SRS limit value, and the EH face value, then compares them under the Regge normalization inherited from Step 7.

Upstream framing: the geometric hinge fold is not the dictionary, and the gap is exactly two. The present file makes that gap operational for the mesh sequence rather than for a single fold identity.

proof idea

Definition layer first: 4D matrix/wave types, then named constants for the SRS limit value and the EH face value. Algebraic identities show the SRS limit equals Regge normalization times the EH face ($\rho=1/2$), hence the two faces are unequal.

Convergence statements are then scoped: the mesh sequence converges to the Regge face and does not converge to the bare EH face. A reading lemma records that a naive symbol-for-symbol identification of moments (R1) fails. Those facts are bundled into the_collision_is_real and a Step8ScopedVerdict proposition discharged by a single holding theorem.

No deep analytic estimates live here; the module is a scope-and-naming layer over the EH4D closers and the geometric-fold comparison.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Feeds the Arc-2 Step-8 axiom audit module, which reprints every declaration of the geometric-fold-versus-dictionary development and expects only the base triple [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound]. Without a scoped statement of what the convergence theorem converges to, the coefficient match from Step 7 could be misread as identity of faces.

In the Recognition gravity chain this is the honest-scope gate for weak-field quadratic action recovery: ledger-facing exports may later inhabit the preflight Props only after the limit face is named. The factor-two collision (Regge $\rho=1/2$ versus bare EH) is the concrete obstruction that prevents silently equating the geometric fold with the banked dictionary. Downstream audit and any full-theory ledger flip both depend on that distinction remaining explicit.

scope and limits

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (2)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (12)