Pith. sign in
module module high

IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.SevenGaps.MeasureInvarianceNoGo

show as:
view Lean formalization →

No-go module for path-sum weights on bounded configuration complexes: relabeling invariance, positivity, and normalization do not select a unique measure. Gravity workers on the Seven Gaps path-sum lane cite it to block pure-invariance uniqueness claims. The argument builds explicit finite complexes (empty and two-point), computes automorphism counts, and exhibits several distinct axiom-satisfying measures.

claimOn the scoped class of bounded incidence complexes at complexity cap $B$, the axiom package of relabeling invariance, positivity, and normalization does not uniquely determine a path-sum weight $w$. Finite model complexes (empty complex; two-point complex) admit multiple distinct normalized positive Aut-invariant measures, including the uniform measure and powers of a base counting measure $\mu$.

background

Lane 2 of the Seven Gaps gravity program works with a scoped configuration class BoundedComplex B: finite incidence data with an explicit complexity cap. The upstream path-sum measure module proves that this class is a Fintype via a coding equivalence, so sums and normalizations are ordinary finite arithmetic rather than measure-theoretic limits.

A candidate path-sum weight $w$ is asked to obey a named package of invariance axioms: invariance under complex automorphisms (relabeling), positivity on admissible configurations, and normalization of the total mass. The module isolates exactly that axiom set; nothing beyond it is assumed.

Concrete test objects are the empty complex and a two-point complex, together with their automorphism groups and cardinalities. Several explicit measures are defined on these objects: a base counting measure $\mu$, the uniform measure, and powered variants $\mu^2$ and $\mu^k$.

proof idea

Definition-first layout, then finite counter-models. The module names the invariance axiom package, then builds the empty complex and a two-point complex with an explicit automorphism equivalence. Automorphism cardinalities and the values of $\mu$ on those complexes are computed by direct enumeration (subsingleton automorphism group on the empty complex; order-two symmetry on the two-point complex).

Several candidate measures (uniform, $\mu$-squared, $\mu$-powered) are shown to satisfy the same invariance, positivity, and normalization axioms while disagreeing as functions. That multiplicity is the no-go: the axiom set does not pin down a unique path-sum weight on the scoped class.

why it matters in Recognition Science

This module is the exact substrate blocker for uniqueness-from-invariance in the path-sum lane. Downstream, MeasureSubstrateBlocker quotes it directly: relabeling invariance, positivity, and normalization do not select a path-sum measure, so any uniqueness claim must import extra structure (e.g. a gauge-density or shell principle).

ZqPhaseStructure imports the same no-go when it moves to the quotient-first object and adds an oscillatory phase model; the continuum limit remains open, but at fixed complexity cap the phase layer sits on top of a non-unique measure substrate.

In the broader Recognition gravity stack this closes a naive route to a canonical $Z_{\mathrm{RS}}$ weight and forces later lanes to state their selection principles explicitly rather than hide them inside invariance language.

scope and limits

used by (2)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (1)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (26)