IndisputableMonolith.Verification.Audit
Audit layer for the Recognition Science Lean monolith: a verification-side module that packages status checks, claim inventories, and consistency hooks used when reviewing formalized RS results. Cite it when tracing how the codebase records what is proved versus conditional or stubbed. No theorem is stated here; the module is organizational scaffolding over Mathlib imports.
claimModule-level audit interface for the RS verification stack: inventory and status hooks over formal claims (proved, conditional, hypothesis interfaces, scaffolding), with no standalone physical identity asserted in this file.
background
Recognition Science is developed inside IndisputableMonolith, with a Verification domain that separates physics content from machine-checkable bookkeeping. Audit sits in that domain: it is the place where claim status, proof style, and dependency edges are meant to be readable without reopening every foundation file.
The only recorded import is Mathlib. No forcing-chain landmarks (T5 J-uniqueness, T6 $\varphi$, T7 eight-tick, T8 $D=3$), RCL identities, or mass-ladder formulas are introduced here; those live upstream in Foundation and physics modules. Locally the setting is meta: how the mirror exposes what Lean has closed versus what remains conditional.
Sibling and edge data for this page are empty, so the module should be read as a thin verification shell rather than a carrier of new RS identities.
proof idea
This is a module page, not a theorem. There is no proof body, no wrapper target, and no depends-on list. Structure is import-only (Mathlib) plus whatever audit definitions or status helpers the file declares; argument content, if any, is deferred to concrete declarations elsewhere in Verification.
why it matters in Recognition Science
Earns its place as the audit surface for the Verification domain: parent consumers are expected to be higher-level verification reports and claim-classification pages that need a single module to hang status conventions on (proved, conditional, hypothesis_interface, scaffolding). It does not itself advance the forcing chain or close a physics identity; it supports refereeing of the mirror by concentrating audit-oriented declarations. With zero used-by edges recorded on this page, treat downstream impact as infrastructural rather than as a named parent theorem.
scope and limits
- Does not prove any RS physical identity (J-cost, phi, dimensions, alpha).
- Does not discharge sorry or close hypothesis interfaces in Foundation.
- Does not define the mass ladder, RCL, or eight-tick dynamics.
- Does not assert completeness of the global claim inventory.
- Does not replace Mathlib or kernel checking; audit is organizational only.