Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Verification.GWTC3RingdownOneMemberDampingStatistic

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Records one-member QNM damping posterior summaries for the GWTC-3 ringdown event S190727h (DS_1mode_10M). Defines the RS damping target, sample mean/std/median/quantiles, residual and z-score from the mean, and the fraction of samples below target. Downstream family-scaling modules cite these constants. The module is structural bookkeeping over the HDF5 sample summary, not a deep existence proof.

claimFor the single GWTC-3 ringdown member $S190727h$ (DS\_1mode\_10M), fix the RS damping target $\tau_{\mathrm{RS}}$ and the posterior damping sample statistics $\mu_\tau$, $\sigma_\tau$, median, and quantiles $q_{0.05},q_{0.16},q_{0.84},q_{0.95}$; define residual $\mu_\tau-\tau_{\mathrm{RS}}$, $z$-score $(\mu_\tau-\tau_{\mathrm{RS}})/\sigma_\tau$, fraction of samples below $\tau_{\mathrm{RS}}$, and mean $f_\tau$.

background

Recognition Science verification against LIGO/Virgo GWTC-3 ringdown data proceeds by extracting quasi-normal-mode (QNM) damping posteriors from public HDF5 releases and comparing them to an RS-native damping target. The upstream module GWTC3RingdownHDF5SampleSummary is a structural theorem (0 sorry) that records the first posterior-summary statistics from a range-read file for member rin/rin_S190727h_pyring_DS_1mode_10M.h5.

This module specializes that summary to the one-member damping statistic: named constants for the RS target, mean, standard deviation, median, outer and 1$\sigma$-style quantiles, residual and standardized residual from the mean, the fraction of posterior mass below the target, and the mean of $f_\tau$. Notation is ordinary sample statistics on the damping coordinate; no new physical law is introduced here.

The local setting is empirical closure bookkeeping inside the Verification domain: freeze the one-event numbers so controlled-family scalings can cite them without re-parsing HDF5.

proof idea

Definition and constant module over the upstream HDF5 sample summary. Sibling bindings name the RS damping target and the usual posterior summaries (mean, std, median, quantiles), then form residual and $z$ from the mean and the fraction of samples below target. No multi-step tactic proof is required beyond structural wiring of those values; the scientific content is the frozen statistic set, not a novel derivation.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Feeds IndisputableMonolith.Verification.GWTC3RingdownDS1Mode10MDampingFamily, which "records the first controlled-family scaling of the Session 123 one-member QNM damping statistic." Without a single-member freeze of mean, quantiles, residual, and fraction-below-target, family scaling has nothing stable to scale.

In the broader RS program this is empirical verification infrastructure rather than a forcing-chain step (T0–T8). It anchors ringdown damping comparisons for one GWTC-3 event so later modules can test whether the RS damping target sits consistently inside the posterior mass across a controlled family. Closure status on the upstream summary (0 sorry, 0 RS-internal axiom) is inherited as the data contract this module exposes.

scope and limits

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (1)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (23)