Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Verification.MassComparison

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Verification module that records PDG-style experimental rest masses and one-sigma uncertainties for the electron, muon, tau, and light quarks u,d,s. Downstream mass-ladder checks cite these constants when comparing Recognition Science predictions to data. Content is pure numeric definitions; no theorems are proved here.

claimFixed experimental anchors $m_e^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_\mu^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_\tau^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_u^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_d^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_s^{\mathrm{exp}}$ (MeV) together with their one-sigma uncertainties $\sigma$, for use in RS mass-ladder residual checks.

background

Recognition Science places particle masses on a $\varphi$-ladder: a yardstick times $\varphi^{r-8+\mathrm{gap}(Z)}$. The Model-layer module Masses.Anchor derives the parameter-free RS constants; this Verification module supplies the experimental side of the comparison only.

Imports pull $\varphi$-interval bounds, the lepton-generation definition layer (T10), and the RS time quantum $\tau_0=1$ tick from Constants. Nothing here claims agreement with data; the numbers are reference values (e.g. electron mass $0.51099895069(16)$ MeV) against which derived ladder outputs can be scored.

Sibling constants cover the three charged leptons and the three light quarks, each paired with an explicit sigma, so residual and $\chi^2$-style checks stay fully explicit in Lean.

proof idea

Definition module, no proofs. Each experimental mass and sigma is introduced as a numeric constant (or abbrev) with a short doc-comment stating the PDG-style value in MeV. Structure is a flat catalogue keyed by species; no lemmas, no tactics, no sorry.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Closes the data side of the RS mass-verification pipeline. Derived ladder masses from Masses.Anchor and lepton-generation definitions need fixed experimental targets; without this catalogue, residual theorems cannot be stated. Sits in the Verification domain rather than the forcing chain (T0–T8) or the RCL, and currently has no recorded downstream Lean dependents in the graph, so it functions as a leaf reference table for paper-level or external comparison scripts.

scope and limits

depends on (4)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (42)