IndisputableMonolith.Verification.MassComparison
Verification module that records PDG-style experimental rest masses and one-sigma uncertainties for the electron, muon, tau, and light quarks u,d,s. Downstream mass-ladder checks cite these constants when comparing Recognition Science predictions to data. Content is pure numeric definitions; no theorems are proved here.
claimFixed experimental anchors $m_e^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_\mu^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_\tau^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_u^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_d^{\mathrm{exp}}, m_s^{\mathrm{exp}}$ (MeV) together with their one-sigma uncertainties $\sigma$, for use in RS mass-ladder residual checks.
background
Recognition Science places particle masses on a $\varphi$-ladder: a yardstick times $\varphi^{r-8+\mathrm{gap}(Z)}$. The Model-layer module Masses.Anchor derives the parameter-free RS constants; this Verification module supplies the experimental side of the comparison only.
Imports pull $\varphi$-interval bounds, the lepton-generation definition layer (T10), and the RS time quantum $\tau_0=1$ tick from Constants. Nothing here claims agreement with data; the numbers are reference values (e.g. electron mass $0.51099895069(16)$ MeV) against which derived ladder outputs can be scored.
Sibling constants cover the three charged leptons and the three light quarks, each paired with an explicit sigma, so residual and $\chi^2$-style checks stay fully explicit in Lean.
proof idea
Definition module, no proofs. Each experimental mass and sigma is introduced as a numeric constant (or abbrev) with a short doc-comment stating the PDG-style value in MeV. Structure is a flat catalogue keyed by species; no lemmas, no tactics, no sorry.
why it matters in Recognition Science
Closes the data side of the RS mass-verification pipeline. Derived ladder masses from Masses.Anchor and lepton-generation definitions need fixed experimental targets; without this catalogue, residual theorems cannot be stated. Sits in the Verification domain rather than the forcing chain (T0–T8) or the RCL, and currently has no recorded downstream Lean dependents in the graph, so it functions as a leaf reference table for paper-level or external comparison scripts.
scope and limits
- Does not derive or prove any RS mass formula.
- Does not claim experimental agreement or compute residuals.
- Does not cover heavy quarks, neutrinos, or gauge bosons.
- Does not update values automatically from external PDG feeds.
- Does not encode unit conversions beyond the stated MeV anchors.
depends on (4)
declarations in this module (42)
-
def
m_e_exp -
def
m_e_exp_sigma -
def
m_mu_exp -
def
m_mu_exp_sigma -
def
m_tau_exp -
def
m_tau_exp_sigma -
def
m_u_exp -
def
m_u_exp_sigma -
def
m_d_exp -
def
m_d_exp_sigma -
def
m_s_exp -
def
m_s_exp_sigma -
def
m_c_exp -
def
m_c_exp_sigma -
def
m_b_exp -
def
m_b_exp_sigma -
def
m_t_exp -
def
m_t_exp_sigma -
def
m_W_exp -
def
m_W_exp_sigma -
def
m_Z_exp -
def
m_Z_exp_sigma -
def
m_H_exp -
def
m_H_exp_sigma -
theorem
lepton_params_derived -
theorem
upquark_params_derived -
theorem
downquark_params_derived -
theorem
generation_torsion_derived -
theorem
lepton_rungs_derived -
def
rs_mass_MeV -
def
ratio_mu_e_RS -
theorem
ratio_mu_e_RS_eq -
def
ratio_tau_e_RS -
theorem
ratio_tau_e_RS_eq -
def
ratio_mu_e_exp -
def
ratio_tau_e_exp -
theorem
phi_pow_11_approx -
theorem
phi_pow_17_approx -
theorem
ratio_mu_e_exp_value -
theorem
ratio_tau_e_exp_value -
theorem
raw_prediction_discrepancy -
def
mass_summary