Pith. sign in
module module moderate

IndisputableMonolith.Verification.NeutrinoBaselineChoiceSet

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Defines the discrete baseline choice set for neutrino rung assignments on the deep phi-ladder. It packages quarter-rung numerators, a canonical candidate, and a small candidate pool against the deep-atmospheric window and structural gap profile. Verification authors cite it when fixing which (r1,r2,r3) triples are admissible before mass-scale checks. The module is definitional scaffolding over NeutrinoSector, not a proved uniqueness theorem.

claimA baseline candidate is a triple of quarter-rung data $(r_1,r_2,r_3)$ with $r_1 = n_1/4$ (and analogous numerators for $r_2,r_3$), together with a canonical choice, a finite candidate pool, a deep-atmospheric acceptance window, a quarter-phase class, and a structural gap profile used to score neutrino deep-ladder placements.

background

Recognition Science places neutrino masses on the deep phi-ladder: integer (or quarter-integer) rungs far below the electron rung $R_e = 2$, typically even integers near $-50$. The upstream NeutrinoSector module states the T14 hypothesis that neutrinos occupy that deep ladder and derives the mass-scale framework from it.

This verification module does not re-derive masses. It fixes the discrete choice language used when comparing baselines: quarter-rung encoding $r_i = n_i/4$, named numerators, a canonical candidate, and a small pool of alternatives. Auxiliary structure includes a deep-atmospheric window (the observational band the baseline must hit), a quarter-phase class, and a structural gap profile that records how the three rungs sit relative to the ladder gaps.

The setting is therefore combinatorial selection inside an already-posed physical hypothesis, not a new dynamical law.

proof idea

This is a definition module, not a proof module. It introduces BaselineCandidate and concrete numeric/structural fields (quarter-rung numerators, $r_1,r_2,r_3$, canonical candidate, candidate pool, deep-atmospheric window, quarter-phase class, structural gap profile). No uniqueness or mass theorem is proved here; downstream verification lemmas are expected to quantify over the pool or pin the canonical choice.

why it matters in Recognition Science

Without a fixed baseline choice set, neutrino-sector verification cannot state which deep-ladder triples are under test. The module sits under the Verification domain and imports NeutrinoSector (T14), so it supplies the discrete input language for any later check that the deep-ladder hypothesis matches atmospheric or hierarchical mass patterns.

Used-by edges are empty in the current graph, so it is presently a leaf definition layer rather than a proved stepping-stone. Its value is bookkeeping integrity: canonical candidate versus pool, quarter-phase class, and structural gap profile make baseline swaps explicit instead of silent parameter changes. Framework landmarks touched only indirectly are the phi-ladder mass formula and the deep-rung placement below $R_e = 2$; T0–T8 forcing is upstream of NeutrinoSector, not of this choice set.

scope and limits

depends on (1)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.

declarations in this module (43)