IndisputableMonolith.Verification.RGTransportPolicyIdentity
Module fixing immutable identity metadata for an external renormalization-group (RG) transport policy artifact used in Recognition Science verification. Auditors cite it to pin a named policy snapshot (canonical 2025 Q4) by path, summary, and match predicates rather than by mutable file contents. Structure is definitional: a record type plus concrete canonical instance and Boolean/path/nonemptiness checks. No deep physics derivation lives here.
claimThe module introduces an immutable identity record for an external RG transport policy artifact, a distinguished canonical 2025 Q4 instance of that record, a predicate that two policy identities match, and path/summary nonemptiness facts for the canonical instance.
background
Recognition Science verification layers often bind Lean theorems to external numerical or policy artifacts (transport kernels, rung tables, RG flows). Those artifacts must be identified without baking mutable bytes into the proof kernel. This module supplies that thin identity layer: a structured tag for an RG transport policy, not the transport equations themselves.
Sibling names indicate a single canonical snapshot labeled 2025 Q4, together with match, path, and summary-nonemptiness obligations. The only import is Mathlib; there is no dependence on the forcing chain (T0–T8), the J-cost, or the mass ladder inside this file. The local setting is pure verification metadata: stable names and emptiness checks so downstream certificates can say which external policy they assume.
proof idea
This is a definition module, not a proof development. It declares an identity record, a concrete canonical 2025 Q4 value, a matching predicate between identities, and lightweight facts that the canonical path and summary are present and that the canonical instance matches itself under that predicate. No tactic-heavy argument or upstream lemma chain is required.
why it matters in Recognition Science
In the Verification domain this module anchors external RG transport policy artifacts so certificates remain reproducible when files move or are re-exported. Downstream consumers (none listed in the graph edges supplied here) would cite the canonical 2025 Q4 identity and the match predicate when discharging policy-side hypotheses of transport or rung-ladder checks. It does not itself advance the forcing chain, RCL, or constants band; it only freezes which external policy a proof claims to use.
scope and limits
- Does not define or prove any RG flow, beta function, or transport kernel.
- Does not bind physics constants (c, hbar, G, alpha) or the phi-ladder mass formula.
- Does not verify file hashes or cryptographic signatures of external artifacts.
- Does not discharge forcing-chain steps T0–T8 or Recognition Composition Law identities.
- Does not assert uniqueness of the canonical 2025 Q4 policy beyond the local match predicate.