pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem proved term proof high

lab_schedule_well_separated

show as:
view Lean formalization →

The theorem shows that a typical laboratory rotation period of 0.06 s and recognition tick of 7.3 fs yield more than 64 recognition ticks per phase in the eight-tick schedule. Experimental physicists checking Information-Limited Gravity null results at lab scales would cite this to confirm separation from the recognition threshold. The proof is a direct unfolding of the phase and tick definitions followed by numerical normalization.

claimLet $T=0.06$ be a typical laboratory rotation period in seconds and $τ_0=7.3×10^{-15}$ the recognition tick. Then the number of recognition ticks per phase satisfies $(T/8)/τ_0>64$.

background

The Flight-Gravity Bridge module connects the ILG weight kernel $w_t(T_{dyn},τ_0)=1+C_{lag}((T_{dyn}/τ_0)^α-1)$ with $α≈0.191$ to rotating lab devices. It formalizes the prediction that $w≈1$ at laboratory scales where dynamical times exceed the recognition tick by many orders of magnitude, using the eight-tick schedule to discretize rotation phases.

proof idea

The proof unfolds scheduleWellSeparated, ticksPerPhase, phaseDuration, typicalLabPeriod_seconds, and tau0_seconds. It then applies norm_num to evaluate the resulting numerical inequality directly.

why it matters in Recognition Science

This result verifies the separation condition required for the null hypothesis that ILG deviations remain negligible at lab scales. It supports the eight-tick octave structure (T7) in the forcing chain and closes a concrete step from RS constants to experimental falsifiability for rotating devices.

scope and limits

formal statement (Lean)

 113theorem lab_schedule_well_separated :
 114    scheduleWellSeparated typicalLabPeriod_seconds tau0_seconds := by

proof body

Term-mode proof.

 115  unfold scheduleWellSeparated ticksPerPhase phaseDuration
 116  unfold typicalLabPeriod_seconds tau0_seconds
 117  -- 0.06 / 8 / 7.3e-15 = 0.0075 / 7.3e-15 ≈ 10¹² >> 64
 118  norm_num
 119
 120/-! ## Null Hypothesis and Falsifiers -/
 121
 122/-- The null hypothesis: at lab scales, w ≈ 1 (no ILG deviation). -/

depends on (9)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.