pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
lemma proved tactic proof high

defect_symmetric

show as:
view Lean formalization →

Symmetry of the d'Alembert defect holds for even H: Δ_H(t,u) equals Δ_H(u,t) for all real t and u. Analysts deriving stability bounds for approximate solutions to the d'Alembert equation cite this to halve the cases in error estimates. The proof is a short tactic sequence that expands the defect definition, applies add_comm and the evenness hypothesis to equate arguments, then simplifies algebraically.

claimLet $H:ℝ→ℝ$ be even. Then for all real $t,u$, the defect satisfies $Δ_H(t,u)=Δ_H(u,t)$, where $Δ_H(t,u):=H(t+u)+H(t-u)-2H(t)H(u)$.

background

The d'Alembert defect is defined in this module as $Δ_H(t,u):=H(t+u)+H(t-u)-2H(t)H(u)$, measuring deviation from the identity $H(t+u)+H(t-u)=2H(t)H(u)$. The function H is the shifted cost $H(x)=J(x)+1$, where J satisfies the Recognition Composition Law; under this reparametrization the RCL becomes the standard d'Alembert equation. The module develops quantitative stability for near-solutions when H is even, C³, and H(0)=1, with the defect bounded on compact squares.

proof idea

The tactic proof first simplifies the defect definition. It then obtains t+u=u+t by add_comm and shows H(t-u)=H(u-t) by rewriting t-u=-(u-t) and applying the even hypothesis. The two equalities are substituted back, after which ring closes the identity.

why it matters in Recognition Science

This lemma supplies a basic symmetry property used throughout the d'Alembert stability development that follows the paper by Washburn and Zlatanović. It rests on the H reparametrization that converts the Recognition Composition Law into d'Alembert form and supports the subsequent uniform bounds and regularity statements in the module. No downstream uses are recorded in the current graph.

scope and limits

formal statement (Lean)

  97lemma defect_symmetric (H : ℝ → ℝ) (hEven : Function.Even H) (t u : ℝ) :
  98    dAlembertDefect H t u = dAlembertDefect H u t := by

proof body

Tactic-mode proof.

  99  simp only [dAlembertDefect]
 100  have h1 : t + u = u + t := add_comm t u
 101  have h2 : H (t - u) = H (u - t) := by
 102    calc H (t - u) = H (-(u - t)) := by ring_nf
 103      _ = H (u - t) := hEven _
 104  rw [h1, h2]
 105  ring
 106
 107/-! ## Defect Bounds and Regularity -/
 108
 109/-- Uniform bound on the defect over a symmetric interval. -/

depends on (9)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.