ScaffoldStatus
plain-language theorem explainer
The ScaffoldStatus structure records completion of the five key links bridging abstract inevitability slogans to concrete cost and CPM conditions. Researchers auditing the foundation module would cite it when checking progress on the abstract-concrete equivalence. It is introduced directly as a record type whose five Boolean fields track independent scaffold milestones.
Claim. A record type whose fields are five independent Boolean flags: whether the unique fixed point of $J$ has been established, whether the defect characterization is complete, whether no infinite defects exist, whether the T5 connection holds, and whether the full chain from cost axioms to $J$ is proven.
background
The module establishes equivalence between abstract inevitability claims (zero-parameter, no alternatives, uniquely forced) and concrete conditions on cost and CPM. Upstream, RSNativeUnits.status supplies the native units with $c=1$, coherence quantum $φ^{-5}$, action quantum $ħ=φ^{-5}$, and the $φ$-ladder. Alignment.status supplies the map between coordinate systems of different agents.
proof idea
This declaration is a direct structure definition. No lemmas or tactics are applied; the five Boolean fields are declared without further reduction.
why it matters
The structure is instantiated by current_scaffold_status, which sets every flag to true and notes that T5 is wired via inevitability_chain plus dAlembert_forces_Jcost while the full chain follows from inevitability_chain. It therefore supports the module's central claim that abstract inevitability is equivalent to concrete cost conditions, advancing the T5 J-uniqueness step of the forcing chain.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.