Pith. sign in
theorem

eval_im

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.PrimitiveRecognitionCalculus.FRSComplexAmplitude
domain
Foundation
line
43 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

The imaginary part of the complex display of an F_RS[i] scalar equals the F_RS carrier evaluation of its imaginary component. Anyone assembling complex amplitudes or Born weights in the primitive recognition calculus cites this projection lemma. The equality is definitional: a one-line reflexivity proof.

Claim. For every finite-description complex scalar $z\in F_{RS}[i]$ (with real and imaginary parts themselves $F_{RS}$ expressions), $\mathrm{Im}(\mathrm{display}(z)) = \mathrm{eval}_{F_{RS}}(z_{\mathrm{im}})$.

background

The module builds complex amplitudes over the Recognition Science carrier field $F_{RS}$. An FRSIExpr is a pair of $F_{RS}$ expressions $(z_{\mathrm{re}}, z_{\mathrm{im}})$, the finite-description model of a scalar in the formal extension $F_{RS}[i]$.

Display sends such a pair into the ambient complex field by evaluating each component via the carrier evaluator and packing the results as a complex number. The real-part companion states the same fact for $\mathrm{Re}$. Together they pin how complex display factors through the two real carrier evaluations.

Local setting is the primitive recognition calculus: amplitudes, Born weights, and norm-squared identities are written against this display, so componentwise projection lemmas keep later equalities inside the real carrier rather than in $\mathbb{C}$.

proof idea

Term-mode proof by rfl. By definition, display of $z$ is the complex number whose imaginary part is exactly FRSCarrier.eval z.im, so the stated equality holds definitionally with no rewrite or lemma application.

why it matters

Sits in the FRS complex-amplitude layer beside eval_re, membership lemmas, displayAmp, and bornWeight. It lets later identities (Born weight nonnegativity, norm-squared display equalities) reason about imaginary parts as ordinary $F_{RS}$ values rather than as opaque complex projections.

No downstream users are recorded yet; the lemma is infrastructure for amplitude bookkeeping rather than a forcing-chain step. It does not touch T5–T8, the RCL, or the mass ladder; it only stabilizes the complex display interface used when recognition amplitudes are written over $F_{RS}[i]$.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.