e_001033
plain-language theorem explainer
At multi-index (0,0,1,0,3,3) the 4D midpoint M2 numerator equals eight times the explicit kernel integer. Gravity analysts assembling the exact Regge midpoint TT identity cite this as one cell of the 256-point kernel table (chunk 0). The proof is a single decide on the unfolded integer equality.
Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(0,0,1,0,3,3)$ in $(\mathrm{Fin}\,4)^6$, the midpoint M2 numerator (fold of coupling contributions) equals eight times the explicit kernel value: $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(0,0,1,0,3,3)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}(0,0,1,0,3,3)$ in $\mathbb{Z}$.
background
The ambient module certifies, cell by cell, that the 4D Regge exact-midpoint M2 numerator equals eight times an explicit sparse kernel on $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$. Module doc: "m2Num = 8·explicitZ, chunk 0 (256 kernel decides)."
The numerator is the integer fold of a fixed coupling list: each term contributes via a local weight at the six indices. The explicit kernel is a pattern-matched integer table on the same six Fin-4 arguments (typical nonzero entries are $\pm 2,\pm 4$; unmatched cells are zero).
This declaration is one concrete cell of that table. Upstream definitions supply both sides; the full universal statement is assembled downstream by exhaustive fin-cases over all $4^6$ index tuples.
proof idea
One-line computational proof: by decide. After unfolding the fold that defines the numerator and the pattern match that defines the explicit kernel at $(0,0,1,0,3,3)$, both sides reduce to concrete integers; the kernel decision procedure discharges the equality.
why it matters
Feeds the parent assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,; m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ and proves it by nested fin-cases, each leaf a chunk decide such as this one. That identity is the algebraic core of the 4D Regge exact-midpoint TT kernel certification in the Gravity analysis stack. It sits inside the discrete geometric side of Recognition gravity (Regge calculus on the eight-tick / $D=3$ lattice), not the T0–T8 forcing chain itself, but it is required machinery for exact curvature bookkeeping once the continuum limit is discretized.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.