e_010031
plain-language theorem explainer
For the index sextuple (0,1,0,0,3,1) on Fin 4, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit integer kernel value. Gravity analysts cite it as one atomic case in the 4D Regge midpoint M2–TT identity. The proof is a single decide evaluation of both integer sides.
Claim. With indices in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the discrete coupling numerator satisfies $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(0,1,0,0,3,1)=8\,Z(0,1,0,0,3,1)$, where $Z$ is the explicit integer kernel on six indices.
background
This module sits in the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis of the M2–TT identity. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is the integer obtained by folding a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an additive integer depending on the six Fin-4 indices. The companion kernel $Z$ is an explicit piecewise map $\mathrm{Fin},4^6\to\mathbb{Z}$ listing the closed-form values on the nonzero patterns (e.g. $4$, $-2$, and symmetric permutations).
The local goal, stated in the module header, is to certify $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8\cdot Z$ on a 256-case chunk by kernel decides. Upstream, both $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ and $Z$ are pure definitions in the KernelCert module; no analytic lemma is required beyond evaluating those definitions at concrete indices.
proof idea
One-line computational proof: decide reduces both sides to concrete integers (the fold for the numerator and the pattern match for $Z$) and checks equality in $\mathbb{Z}$. No lemmas are invoked beyond the elaborator’s evaluation of the two definitions at $(0,1,0,0,3,1)$.
why it matters
This is one atomic brick in the exhaustive case split that yields the parent theorem $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z$ for all six Fin-4 indices. That assembly theorem runs nested fin_cases over $a,b,c,d,i,j$ and lands on chunk theorems such as this one. In the Recognition gravity stack the identity is the algebraic core of the exact midpoint M2–TT relation in 4D Regge calculus; certifying every kernel cell removes a scaffolding gap between the coupling-list definition and the closed-form $Z$ table. It does not itself touch the T0–T8 forcing chain, but it stabilizes the discrete gravity side that later interfaces with continuum limits.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.