e_013100
plain-language theorem explainer
For the six-index slot (0,1,3,1,0,0), the folded coupling numerator m2Num equals eight times the explicit integer kernel explicitZ. Gravity analysts cite it as one atomic case in the 4D Regge midpoint M2–TT identity. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.
Claim. At multi-index $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(0,1,3,1,0,0)$ with each index in $\{0,1,2,3\}$, the summed coupling numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(0,1,3,1,0,0)$ equals $8\,Z(0,1,3,1,0,0)$, where $Z$ is the explicit integer kernel on six $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$ arguments.
background
In the 4D Regge midpoint analysis, the M2–TT identity is checked by comparing a folded numerator against a closed-form integer kernel. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start at 0 and add each term's contribution at the six indices. The comparison target is $\mathrm{explicitZ}$, a total function $\mathrm{Fin},4^6\to\mathbb{Z}$ given by a finite pattern of integer values (e.g. $4$, $-2$, and other sparse entries).
This module is chunk 1 of that case split: it discharges individual hexuples by kernel decision so the assembler can recombine them. The local claim is exactly one such hexuple equality $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8\cdot Z$.
proof idea
One-line proof by decide. Both sides reduce to concrete integers: the left via the fold definition of $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ over couplingZList, the right via the pattern-matching definition of explicitZ at $(0,1,3,1,0,0)$. Lean’s decision procedure checks the integer equality; no lemmas beyond the two defs are required.
why it matters
The parent theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ asserts the identity for every hexuple in $\mathrm{Fin},4^6$ by exhaustive fin_cases. Each atomic e_* lemma such as this one supplies one branch of that case tree. Closing the full identity certifies that the folded Regge coupling numerator is exactly eight times the explicit Z kernel, which is the algebraic content of the midpoint M2–TT check in this 4D gravity analysis stack. It is bookkeeping infrastructure rather than a new physical law, but without the chunk lemmas the assembler cannot finish.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.