Pith. sign in
theorem

e_021101

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk02
domain
Gravity
line
98 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six Fin-4 indices (0,2,1,1,0,1), the integer numerator m2Num equals eight times the closed-form explicitZ value. Gravity analysts assembling the full Regge midpoint M2TT identity cite this as one of the 256 kernel cells. The proof is a single decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(0,2,1,1,0,1)$ in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the folded coupling numerator satisfies $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(0,2,1,1,0,1)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}(0,2,1,1,0,1)$.

background

In the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis, two integer-valued maps on six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ indices are compared. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: each term contributes via a local kernel, and the fold starts at zero. The comparison target $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ is a sparse pattern-matched table of small integers (entries such as $4$, $-2$, and so on on selected multi-indices).

The module is chunk 2 of a 256-cell kernel certification that $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ pointwise. Each cell is an independent equality at one multi-index; the present declaration treats $(0,2,1,1,0,1)$.

proof idea

One-line kernel proof: decide evaluates both sides as concrete Int values (the fold for $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ at this tuple, and the pattern match for $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$) and discharges the equality by computation. No lemmas beyond the two definitions are invoked.

why it matters

The parent theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ assembles the universal statement $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,, m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ by exhaustive fin_cases on all six indices. Each chunk cell such as this one supplies one branch of that case split. In the gravity stack this identity is the algebraic backbone of the Regge midpoint M2TT certification: once the numerator matches eight times the explicit table everywhere, downstream curvature and mass-response identities can quote a single closed form rather than a fold. It is pure discrete linear algebra on the 4D index set, not a continuum GR claim.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.