Pith. sign in
theorem

e_022030

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk02
domain
Gravity
line
157 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the multi-index (0,2,2,0,3,0), the folded Regge coupling numerator equals eight times the tabulated explicit kernel value. Gravity analysts cite this cell when assembling the full 4D midpoint M2 TT identity over Fin 4. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(0,2,2,0,3,0)$ in $(\mathrm{Fin}\,4)^6$, the summed coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit kernel entry: $N_2(0,2,2,0,3,0)=8\,Z(0,2,2,0,3,0)$.

background

This module is chunk 2 of a 256-cell kernel certification that the 4D Regge midpoint numerator $N_2$ equals eight times an explicit closed-form table $Z$ on every sextuple of indices in $\mathrm{Fin},4$.

Upstream, $N_2(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list and summing each term's contribution at those indices. The companion table $Z$ is a pattern-matched integer function on the same six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ arguments (sample clauses include $Z(0,0,1,1,2,2)=4$ and $Z(0,0,1,2,1,2)=-2$).

The local goal is purely algebraic bookkeeping: discharge one concrete index cell so a later exhaustive fin_cases assembly can conclude the identity for all $4^6$ inputs.

proof idea

One-line computational proof: decide evaluates both sides at the fixed indices $(0,2,2,0,3,0)$. The left side reduces by unfolding the fold over the coupling list; the right side multiplies the matched table entry by 8. Both are concrete integers, so the kernel closes the equality with no lemmas beyond definitional reduction.

why it matters

Feeds the parent assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,, N_2=8Z$ and proves it by six nested fin_cases over $\mathrm{Fin},4$, each leaf a chunk cell like this one.

In the Recognition gravity stack, that global identity is the certified algebraic core of the exact midpoint M2 TT relation in 4D Regge calculus. Without the cell-by-cell kernel, the assembly cannot discharge the numerator side. This is scaffolding closure for a proved identity, not an open physical hypothesis; it does not itself invoke the forcing chain (T5–T8) or the RCL, but sits downstream in the discrete gravity analysis those landmarks motivate.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.