Pith. sign in
theorem

e_033102

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk03
domain
Gravity
line
227 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index tuple (0,3,3,1,0,2) in Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the explicit Z-kernel value. Gravity analysts assembling the 4D Regge midpoint M2TT identity cite this as one of the 256 kernel cases. The proof is a single kernel decide on the concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(0,3,3,1,0,2)$ with each index in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the folded coupling numerator satisfies $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$.

background

In the 4D Regge midpoint analysis, two integer-valued kernels on six Fin-4 indices are compared. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is the fold of a fixed coupling list: it sums a local contribution over every coupling triple. The comparison target $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ is a sparse pattern table that returns a handful of small integers (typically $\pm 2$ or $4$) on selected index patterns and zero elsewhere.

The local module is chunk 3 of the exhaustive case split that asserts $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ at every multi-index. The ambient claim is the algebraic identity needed for the exact midpoint M2TT reduction in the gravity analysis stack; the chunk files discharge the 256 concrete evaluations by kernel decision rather than by a closed-form argument.

proof idea

One-line computational proof: by decide. Lean evaluates both sides at the fixed indices $(0,3,3,1,0,2)$ and checks integer equality. No lemmas are invoked beyond the definitions of m2Num (fold of contributions) and explicitZ (pattern table).

why it matters

This case is one brick in the assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states the identity for all six Fin-4 indices by exhaustive fin_cases. That universal equality is the certified numerator step of the Regge exact-midpoint M2TT identity in 4D. Within Recognition Science gravity work it supplies a machine-checked algebraic reduction on the discrete curvature side, rather than a continuum approximation. It does not itself touch the forcing chain (T0–T8) or the J-cost; it is pure discrete-kernel bookkeeping downstream of those foundations.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.