e_110320
plain-language theorem explainer
Pointwise identity: the folded midpoint numerator at multi-index (1,1,0,3,2,0) equals eight times the explicit integer table entry. Gravity analysts assembling the 4D Regge exact midpoint M2 TT identity cite this among the 256 kernel chunks. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete Fin-4 integers.
Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(1,1,0,3,2,0)$ in $(\mathrm{Fin}\,4)^6$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit closed-form integer: $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(1,1,0,3,2,0)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}(1,1,0,3,2,0)$.
background
In the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis, the numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start at 0 and add each contribution term at the six Fin-4 indices. The companion table $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ is a sparse integer function on $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$ with a finite pattern of nonzero values (e.g. $\pm 2,,4$ on selected index patterns).
The local module is chunk 5 of the 256-point kernel certification that $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ holds at every multi-index. Each chunk theorem pins one concrete sextuple so the assembler can discharge the universal statement by exhaustive fin_cases.
proof idea
One-line computational proof: decide evaluates both sides at the concrete Fin-4 sextuple $(1,1,0,3,2,0)$. The left side reduces by folding the coupling list; the right side looks up the explicit integer table and multiplies by 8. Equality of the resulting integers is decided in the kernel.
why it matters
Feeds the assembler theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,; m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ and proves it by six nested fin_cases over Fin 4 (256 goals). Each goal is closed by a chunk identity of this form.
That universal equality is the algebraic core of the Regge exact-midpoint M2 TT identity in 4D: it replaces the folded coupling sum by a sparse closed form, enabling exact (not approximate) midpoint curvature bookkeeping in the gravity analysis stack. No T0–T8 forcing step is touched here; the result is pure discrete-geometry algebra inside the gravity domain.
Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.