Pith. sign in
theorem

e_110331

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk05
domain
Gravity
line
78 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index tuple (1,1,0,3,3,1) on Fin 4, the folded Regge midpoint numerator m2Num equals eight times the closed-form kernel value explicitZ. Gravity analysts assembling the 4D midpoint M2TT identity cite this as one of the 256 kernel cells. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $a{=}1,b{=}1,c{=}0,d{=}3,i{=}3,j{=}1$ in $\mathbb{F}_4$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit integer kernel: $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(1,1,0,3,3,1)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}(1,1,0,3,3,1)$.

background

In the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis, two integer-valued maps on six Fin-4 indices are compared cellwise. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an integer via a local contrib rule, and the fold starts at 0. The comparison target $Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ is an explicit piecewise integer table on the same six indices (sample clauses include values $4$, $-2$, and so on).

The local module is chunk 5 of the 256-cell kernel certification that $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ everywhere. Each chunk theorem pins one concrete sextuple so the later assembly can discharge the universal statement by exhaustive fin_cases.

proof idea

One-line kernel proof: decide evaluates both sides at the concrete Fin-4 sextuple $(1,1,0,3,3,1)$ and checks integer equality. No lemmas are invoked beyond the definitions of $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ (the fold over couplingZList) and $Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ (the explicit case table).

why it matters

Feeds the assembly theorem $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ for all Fin-4 sextuples, which is proved by nested fin_cases over the six indices and therefore depends on every cell identity of this form. That universal equality is the algebraic core of the Regge exact-midpoint M2TT identity in 4D gravity analysis inside the monolith. It is bookkeeping, not a new physical law: it certifies that the folded coupling numerator matches the closed kernel used downstream in the midpoint identity chain.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.