Pith. sign in
theorem

e_112131

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk05
domain
Gravity
line
174 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Finite-case certificate: the coupling numerator m2Num at multi-index (1,1,2,1,3,1) equals eight times the explicit integer table explicitZ. Gravity analysts cite it when assembling the pointwise Regge midpoint M2–TT identity over all Fin-4 sextuples. The proof is a single kernel decide on a concrete integer equality.

Claim. For the multi-index $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(1,1,2,1,3,1)$ with each coordinate in $\mathbb{F}_4$, the folded coupling numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ equals $8$ times the explicit closed-form integer $Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$.

background

In the 4D Regge midpoint analysis, two integer-valued maps on six Fin-4 indices are compared. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is the fold of a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an integer via a local kernel, and the fold starts at zero. The companion map $Z$ is an explicit pattern-matched table on the same six indices (sample entries include $4$, $-2$, and so on).

The module is chunk 5 of a 256-case kernel split: each chunk theorem pins one concrete sextuple so that the global identity $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8Z$ can be reassembled by exhaustive fin_cases. The local setting is pure integer arithmetic on a finite index set; no continuum limit is taken here.

proof idea

One-line computational certificate: decide evaluates both sides at the fixed indices $(1,1,2,1,3,1)$ and checks integer equality in the kernel. No lemmas are invoked beyond the definitions of $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ (fold of contributions) and $Z$ (explicit table).

why it matters

Feeds the assembler m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,, m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8Z$ and discharges the universal quantifier by six nested fin_cases over Fin 4. Each chunk theorem such as this one is a leaf of that case tree. In the broader gravity stack the identity is the algebraic backbone of the exact midpoint M2–TT comparison in 4D Regge calculus; closing every leaf removes scaffolding from that comparison. It does not itself touch the T0–T8 forcing chain or the Recognition Composition Law, but it is part of the discrete curvature bookkeeping those layers later consume.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.