Pith. sign in
theorem

e_120102

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk06
domain
Gravity
line
35 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index tuple (1,2,0,1,0,2) on Fin 4, the Regge M2 numerator equals eight times the explicit kernel value Z. Gravity analysts cite it when discharging one cell of the 4D midpoint M2TT identity. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $a{=}1,b{=}2,c{=}0,d{=}1,i{=}0,j{=}2$ in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the folded coupling numerator satisfies $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(1,2,0,1,0,2)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}(1,2,0,1,0,2)$.

background

This module is chunk 6 of a 256-cell kernel certification that the Regge exact-midpoint M2 numerator equals eight times an explicit integer table on all six Fin-4 indices. The ambient setting is 4D discrete gravity analysis: couplings are folded into an integer numerator, then matched against a closed-form kernel.

The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a contribution function over a fixed coupling list, starting from 0. The comparison table $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ is a total function $\mathrm{Fin},4^6\to\mathbb{Z}$ given by pattern match (e.g. $(0,0,1,1,2,2)\mapsto 4$, $(0,0,1,2,1,2)\mapsto -2$, and similarly for the remaining support).

Upstream, both definitions live in the KernelCert module; the present chunk only evaluates one concrete multi-index.

proof idea

One-line computational proof: decide evaluates both sides at the fixed indices $(1,2,0,1,0,2)$ and checks integer equality. No lemmas are invoked beyond the reducible definitions of the folded numerator and the explicit table.

why it matters

The parent assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ asserts the identity for every six-tuple in $\mathrm{Fin},4$, proved by exhaustive fin_cases on all six indices. Each chunk theorem such as this one discharges one concrete cell of that $4^6$ grid, so the assembly can treat the equality as fully decided rather than symbolic.

In the broader Recognition gravity stack this is bookkeeping for the Regge midpoint M2TT identity in 4D: once numerator and explicit kernel agree everywhere (scaled by 8), downstream curvature and mass-ladder arguments can quote a single closed form instead of a fold. It does not itself touch T0–T8 or the RCL; it is infrastructure inside the gravity analysis layer.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.