Pith. sign in
theorem

e_210321

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk09
domain
Gravity
line
74 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index slot (2,1,0,3,2,1) on Fin 4, the folded Regge midpoint numerator equals eight times the tabulated explicit kernel value. Gravity analysts cite it as one atomic case in the 4D m2Num≡8·Z identity. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. With indices in $\{0,1,2,3\}$, the midpoint numerator at $(2,1,0,3,2,1)$ satisfies $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(2,1,0,3,2,1)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}(2,1,0,3,2,1)$.

background

In the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis, the numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an integer weight at a six-tuple of Fin-4 indices, and the fold starts from zero. The companion table $Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ is an explicit pattern-matched integer function on the same six indices (sample values include $\pm 2,4$ on diagonal and off-diagonal slots).

The module is chunk 9 of a 256-case kernel certification that $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ pointwise. The local setting is pure finite enumeration over $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$, not continuum GR: each chunk discharges a block of concrete equalities so the global identity can be assembled by case split.

proof idea

One-line proof by decide. Both sides reduce to closed integer expressions at the fixed indices $(2,1,0,3,2,1)$: the left via the fold definition of the numerator, the right via the pattern match in the explicit table (scaled by 8). The kernel checks integer equality; no lemmas beyond the two definitions are invoked.

why it matters

Feeds the parent assembly theorem $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ for all six Fin-4 indices, whose proof case-splits on every coordinate and lands on these chunk decides. That identity is the certified algebraic core of the Regge exact-midpoint $M_2$ TT kernel in 4D inside the Gravity analysis stack. It does not itself touch the T0–T8 forcing chain or the J-cost; it is infrastructure that keeps the discrete curvature bookkeeping exact before continuum or phenomenological limits are taken.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.