Pith. sign in
theorem

e_213311

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk09
domain
Gravity
line
262 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Pointwise identity: the Regge midpoint m2 numerator at multi-index (2,1,3,3,1,1) equals eight times the explicit Z-table entry. Gravity analysts cite it as one of 256 kernel cells in the 4D TT midpoint certificate. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(2,1,3,3,1,1)$ with each coordinate in $\{0,1,2,3\}$, the folded coupling numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ equals $8$ times the explicit integer table value $Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$.

background

In the 4D Regge midpoint analysis, two integer-valued kernels on six Fin 4 indices are compared. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an integer contrib and the fold starts at zero. The comparison target is an explicit sparse table $Z$ on the same six indices, with nonzero pattern values such as $4$ and $-2$ on selected index patterns.

This module is chunk 9 of a 256-cell partition of the full $4^6$ index space. The local claim is the scalar identity $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8\cdot Z$ at one fixed multi-index. Upstream, both sides are pure definitions in the kernel certificate module; no analytic hypothesis is carried.

proof idea

One-line computational proof: decide evaluates both sides at the concrete six-tuple $(2,1,3,3,1,1)$ and checks integer equality. The left side reduces by unfolding the fold over couplingZList; the right side multiplies the matched explicitZ clause by eight. No lemmas beyond kernel evaluation are required.

why it matters

Feeds the assembler theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states the identity for every six-tuple in Fin 4 by exhaustive fin_cases. That global equality is the algebraic core of the Regge exact midpoint M2 TT identity in 4D: it certifies that the folded numerator is exactly eight copies of the closed-form Z table, so continuum or continuum-limit arguments can replace the fold by the sparse explicit kernel.

Within Recognition gravity work this is bookkeeping infrastructure rather than a forcing-chain step (T0–T8). It closes one cell of the discrete certificate that underwrites the midpoint curvature bookkeeping used in the broader RS gravity analysis.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.