Pith. sign in
theorem

e_220203

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk10
domain
Gravity
line
52 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Pointwise identity: the midpoint mass-squared numerator at multi-index (2,2,0,2,0,3) equals eight times the explicit Z-coupling table at those indices. Gravity analysts assembling the 4D Regge exact midpoint M2TT identity cite these kernel chunks. The proof is a single decidability check on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $a=b=2$, $c=0$, $d=2$, $i=0$, $j=3$ in $\mathbb{F}_4$, the folded coupling numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ equals $8$ times the explicit integer coupling $Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$.

background

In the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis, the mass-squared numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is the fold of local contributions over a fixed coupling list: each term depends on six $\mathbb{F}_4$ indices. The companion table $Z$ is an explicit integer-valued function on the same six indices, hard-coded on the nonzero patterns that appear in the kernel (e.g. diagonal blocks $4$, off-diagonal $-2$).

This module is chunk 10 of a 256-way split of the kernel identity $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8Z$. Each chunk discharges one concrete multi-index by computation rather than by a symbolic argument over all of $(\mathbb{F}_4)^6$.

proof idea

Both sides evaluate to concrete integers once the six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ arguments are fixed. The tactic decide runs the kernel's decidable equality on those integers and closes the goal. No lemmas beyond the definitions of the numerator fold and the explicit $Z$ table are required.

why it matters

The parent assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ quantifies over all six indices and reduces by exhaustive fin_cases; each leaf is one of these chunk identities. Closing every leaf yields the global numerator identity used in the Regge midpoint M2TT certification. Within Recognition gravity, that identity is bookkeeping for the discrete curvature/mass kernel, not a new forcing-chain step (T0–T8), but it is required scaffolding for the exact 4D midpoint analysis.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.