Pith. sign in
theorem

e_221302

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk10
domain
Gravity
line
131 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Pointwise identity: the midpoint Regge $m_2$ numerator at multi-index $(2,2,1,3,0,2)$ equals eight times the explicit $Z$-table entry there. Gravity analysts cite it when assembling the global $m_2\mathrm{Num}=8\cdot\mathrm{explicit}Z$ kernel identity. The proof is a single kernel `decide` on concrete integers.

Claim. For the six Fin-4 indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(2,2,1,3,0,2)$, the folded coupling numerator $m_2\mathrm{Num}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ equals $8$ times the explicit integer table value $Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$.

background

This module is chunk 10 of a 256-way kernel certification that the midpoint Regge $m_2$ numerator equals eight times an explicit integer table on all six-index combinations in $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$.

Upstream, $m_2\mathrm{Num}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: it accumulates every local contribution at those indices into a single integer. The companion table $\mathrm{explicit}Z$ is a pattern-matched $\mathrm{Fin},4^6\to\mathbb{Z}$ function that records the closed-form values the fold is expected to hit (e.g. $4$, $-2$, and sparse zeros elsewhere).

The local claim is one concrete cell of that comparison, at multi-index $(2,2,1,3,0,2)$.

proof idea

One-line kernel proof: decide evaluates both sides as concrete integers (the fold defining the numerator versus eight times the matched table entry) and discharges equality by computation. No lemmas beyond the two definitions are required.

why it matters

Parent theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ quantifies over all six Fin-4 indices and proves $m_2\mathrm{Num}=8\cdot\mathrm{explicit}Z$ by exhaustive fin_cases; each chunk theorem such as this one supplies one decided cell of that case tree. In the Recognition gravity stack this identity is the algebraic certificate that the midpoint Regge mass-squared numerator collapses to a sparse explicit kernel, the discrete input needed before continuum or continuum-limit gravity statements. It does not itself touch the forcing chain (T5–T8) or the RCL; it is pure 4D combinatorial bookkeeping inside the Regge analysis layer.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.