Pith. sign in
theorem

e_223333

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk10
domain
Gravity
line
272 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Finite-case certificate that the 4D midpoint Regge numerator equals eight times the explicit integer kernel at multi-index (2,2,3,3,3,3). Gravity analysts assembling the full m2Num = 8·Z identity cite this chunk. Proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integer arithmetic.

Claim. At the multi-index $(2,2,3,3,3,3)\in(\mathbb{F}_4)^6$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit kernel value: $N(2,2,3,3,3,3)=8\,Z(2,2,3,3,3,3)$.

background

In the 4D Regge midpoint analysis, two integer-valued maps on six indices in $\mathbb{F}_4$ are compared. The numerator $N=\mathrm{m2Num}$ is the fold of a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an integer $\mathrm{contrib}$ and the accumulator starts at 0. The comparison target $Z=\mathrm{explicitZ}$ is a closed pattern-match table on the same six indices (sample entries include $Z(0,0,1,1,2,2)=4$ and $Z(0,0,1,2,1,2)=-2$).

The local module is chunk 10 of the kernel-decide campaign that checks $N=8Z$ pointwise. The ambient goal is the exact midpoint M2/TT identity in four dimensions; this file only discharges one concrete sextuple among the $4^6$ cases.

proof idea

One-line tactic proof: decide. Both sides reduce to closed integers once the six Fin 4 arguments are literals, so the kernel evaluates the fold defining $N$ and the match defining $Z$ and checks equality with the factor 8. No lemmas are invoked beyond the definitions of m2Num and explicitZ.

why it matters

Feeds the assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j:\mathbb{F}_4,; N(a,b,c,d,i,j)=8,Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ and is proved by exhaustive fin_cases on the six indices. Each chunk theorem such as this one supplies one decided cell so the universal identity is a pure case split rather than a fresh algebraic derivation.

In the broader Recognition gravity stack this identity is bookkeeping for the exact midpoint Regge calculus comparison (M2 versus TT) in $D=4$. It does not itself touch the forcing chain (T0–T8), the J-cost, or the $\varphi$-ladder; it is infrastructure that keeps the discrete curvature numerics certificate-complete.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.