Pith. sign in
theorem

e_303003

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk12
domain
Gravity
line
212 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index tuple (3,0,3,0,0,3) on Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the closed-form kernel value explicitZ. Gravity analysts cite these pointwise identities when assembling the global Regge midpoint M2–TT relation. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $a{=}3$, $b{=}0$, $c{=}3$, $d{=}0$, $i{=}0$, $j{=}3$ in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit integer kernel: $N(3,0,3,0,0,3)=8\,Z(3,0,3,0,0,3)$.

background

This module is one chunk of a 256-case kernel certification that the Regge midpoint numerator equals eight times an explicit integer table on $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$. The local slogan is $N=8Z$, proved by exhaustive decide.

The numerator $N(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start at $0$ and add each term's contribution at those six indices. The table $Z$ is a pattern-matched integer function on the same six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ arguments (typical nonzero values $\pm 2,,4$ on selected index patterns).

The ambient setting is 4D discrete gravity analysis: certifying an exact midpoint identity between an $M_2$ numerator built from couplings and a closed-form kernel, case by case before assembly.

proof idea

One-line proof by decide. Both sides reduce to concrete Int values for the fixed indices $(3,0,3,0,0,3)$: the left via the fold definition of the numerator, the right via the pattern match of the explicit kernel (scaled by 8). No lemmas are invoked beyond kernel evaluation of equality on integers.

why it matters

Feeds the assembly theorem that $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,, N=8Z$ on $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$, proved by nested fin_cases that dispatch to these pointwise chunk identities. Without the full set of 256 decides, the global Regge exact midpoint $M_2$–TT numerator identity stays uncertified.

In the Recognition gravity stack this is pure discrete-kernel bookkeeping: it locks the algebraic factor of eight between the folded coupling numerator and the explicit $Z$ table used downstream in 4D midpoint analysis. It does not itself invoke the forcing chain (T5–T8) or the RCL; it is infrastructure for the exact discrete gravity identity those layers later consume.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.