Pith. sign in
theorem

e_310222

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk13
domain
Gravity
line
59 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index slot (3,1,0,2,2,2) on Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the closed-form kernel value explicitZ. Gravity analysts cite it when assembling the global identity m2Num = 8·explicitZ over the 4D Regge midpoint kernel. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $a{=}3$, $b{=}1$, $c{=}0$, $d{=}2$, $i{=}2$, $j{=}2$ in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit integer kernel: $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(3,1,0,2,2,2)=8\,Z(3,1,0,2,2,2)$.

background

This module is one chunk of the 4D Regge exact-midpoint analysis: it certifies pointwise that the folded numerator equals eight times a closed-form integer table. The ambient setting is discrete gravity on a 4-index simplex kernel, with all indices ranging over $\mathrm{Fin},4$.

The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list and summing a local contribution at each term. The comparison target $Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is an explicit integer-valued pattern match on the six indices (typical nonzero values $\pm 2,,4$). The module header states the goal as $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8\cdot Z$ via 256 kernel decides, of which this declaration is one slot.

proof idea

One-line proof by decide. Both sides reduce to concrete Int values once the six Fin 4 arguments are fixed: the left side evaluates the fold of couplingZList with contrib, the right side multiplies the pattern-matched explicitZ entry by 8. No lemmas are invoked beyond kernel evaluation of those two definitions.

why it matters

Feeds the assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,; m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z$ by exhaustive fin_cases on all six indices. Each chunk theorem such as this one discharges one concrete case so the global identity is a pure case split rather than a symbolic fold argument.

In the Recognition gravity stack this identity is bookkeeping for the exact midpoint Regge kernel in 4D: once numerator and closed form agree everywhere, downstream curvature and mass-ladder comparisons can quote a single compact $Z$ table instead of the folded sum. It does not itself touch T5–T8 or the RCL; it is infrastructure inside the gravity analysis layer.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.