Pith. sign in
theorem

e_311033

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk13
domain
Gravity
line
96 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index slot (3,1,1,0,3,3) on Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the closed-form kernel explicitZ. Gravity analysts cite it when assembling the exact midpoint M2 TT identity in 4D Regge calculus. The proof is a single kernel decide on the concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(3,1,1,0,3,3)$ in $(\mathrm{Fin}\,4)^6$, the folded coupling numerator satisfies $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(3,1,1,0,3,3)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}(3,1,1,0,3,3)$.

background

This module is one certified chunk of the identity $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8\cdot Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ on all six-tuples of $\mathrm{Fin},4$, used in the 4D Regge exact-midpoint M2 TT analysis. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start at $0$ and add each local contribution $\mathrm{contrib},t,a,b,c,d,i,j$. The comparison target $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ is an explicit integer-valued kernel on the same six indices, given by a finite pattern-match table (entries such as $4$, $-2$, and so on).

Chunk 13 isolates one block of those kernel decisions so the full $4^6$ case split can be assembled without a single monolithic proof term. Upstream, both $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ and $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ live in the KernelCert module that supplies the raw definitions this equality instantiates.

proof idea

One-line computational proof: decide evaluates both sides at the concrete Fin-4 six-tuple $(3,1,1,0,3,3)$ and checks integer equality. No lemmas are invoked beyond the reducible definitions of $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ (list fold of contrib) and $Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ (pattern match).

why it matters

Parent theorem $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{explicit}}$ (forall on $(\mathrm{Fin},4)^6$) is assembled by exhaustive fin-cases; this chunk discharges the single cell $(3,1,1,0,3,3)$. That global identity is infrastructure for the exact midpoint M2 TT relation in 4D Regge gravity inside the Recognition Science gravity stack. It does not itself invoke the forcing chain (T5 J-uniqueness, T8 $D=3$), but it sits in the discrete-geometry layer that must match continuum limits once the eight-tick and dimension constraints are in force. Closing every chunk removes scaffolding from the M2 numerator certification.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.