Pith. sign in
theorem

e_311210

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk13
domain
Gravity
line
117 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Pointwise kernel identity: for multi-index (3,1,1,2,1,0) the midpoint M2 numerator equals eight times the explicit Z coupling. Gravity analysts cite it when assembling the full 4D Regge midpoint TT identity over all Fin-4 sextuples. The proof is a single kernel decide on two closed integer expressions.

Claim. For the multi-index $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(3,1,1,2,1,0)$ with each entry in $\mathbb{F}_4$, the folded coupling numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ equals $8$ times the explicit integer coupling $Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$.

background

In the 4D Regge midpoint analysis, two integer-valued maps on six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ indices are compared. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an integer via a local contrib kernel, and the fold starts at zero. The comparison target explicitZ is a sparse case table of small integers (entries such as $4$, $-2$, and so on) that encodes the closed-form Z coupling for the midpoint TT identity.

This module is chunk 13 of a 256-way kernel split: each chunk discharges a block of concrete index sextuples of the claim $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8\cdot Z$. The local setting is pure integer arithmetic on a finite index set; no continuum limit or metric signature is invoked here.

proof idea

One-line kernel proof: decide evaluates both sides as concrete Int values for the fixed sextuple $(3,1,1,2,1,0)$ and confirms equality. No lemmas beyond the definitions of $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ (the fold over couplingZList) and explicitZ (the case table) are required.

why it matters

Feeds the assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j:\mathrm{Fin},4,; m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8\cdot Z$ by exhausting all sextuples. That global identity is the algebraic core of the 4D Regge exact-midpoint M2 TT certificate in the Gravity analysis stack. Within Recognition Science this sits in the discrete geometric layer that underwrites continuum gravity limits; it does not itself touch the T0–T8 forcing chain, but it is part of the certified scaffolding that keeps the Regge side exact before continuum identification.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.