Pith. sign in
theorem

e_312121

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk13
domain
Gravity
line
170 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index slot (3,1,2,1,2,1) on Fin 4, the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times the tabulated kernel value explicitZ. Gravity analysts assembling the exact midpoint M2 TT identity cite this as one of the 256 kernel cells. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $a{=}3,\,b{=}1,\,c{=}2,\,d{=}1,\,i{=}2,\,j{=}1$ in $\mathrm{Fin}\,4$, the folded coupling numerator equals eight times the explicit integer kernel: $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(3,1,2,1,2,1)=8\,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}(3,1,2,1,2,1)$.

background

This module is chunk 13 of a 256-cell case split proving $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8,Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ for the exact midpoint M2 TT identity in 4D Regge analysis. Indices run over $\mathrm{Fin},4$ (four spacetime directions).

The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ is defined by folding a fixed coupling list: start at 0 and add each local contribution contrib at those indices. The comparison value $Z_{\mathrm{ex}}$ is an explicit integer table on the same six $\mathrm{Fin},4$ arguments (sample entries include $4$, $-2$, and so on for distinguished index patterns).

The local claim is one concrete cell of that table identity, not the universal statement.

proof idea

One-line proof by decide. Both sides reduce to concrete Int values: the left via the fold definition of m2Num, the right via the pattern-match table explicitZ scaled by 8. Lean’s kernel decision procedure discharges the integer equality with no lemmas or case splits in this file.

why it matters

Parent theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ assembles all 256 cells by nested fin_cases on $(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ and invokes each chunk equality such as this one. Closing every cell yields the exact algebraic identity between the folded coupling numerator and eight times the explicit kernel, which is the computational heart of the 4D Regge midpoint M2 TT certification in the Gravity analysis stack.

In the broader Recognition framework this sits inside the discrete gravity / Regge side of the forcing chain (spatial $D=3$ plus time), supplying a machine-checked numerator identity rather than a continuum curvature argument. It does not itself touch $\phi$-ladder masses or $\alpha$; it is pure index algebra supporting the geometric certificate.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.