Pith. sign in
theorem

e_313210

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk13
domain
Gravity
line
245 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

For the six-index slot (3,1,3,2,1,0) on Fin 4, the folded M2 numerator equals eight times the explicit Z kernel entry. Gravity analysts cite it when assembling the full midpoint M2–TT identity over the 4D index cube. The proof is a single kernel decide on that concrete integer equality.

Claim. With indices in $\{0,1,2,3\}$, the M2 numerator at $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(3,1,3,2,1,0)$ equals $8$ times the explicit $Z$-kernel value at the same indices: $N_{M_2}(3,1,3,2,1,0)=8\,Z(3,1,3,2,1,0)$.

background

This module is one chunk of the 4D Regge midpoint M2–TT identity certification: the claim that the folded numerator m2Num equals eight times a sparse explicit integer kernel explicitZ on every six-tuple of Fin-4 indices.

m2Num a b c d i j is defined by folding a coupling list and summing local contributions at those indices. explicitZ is the closed-form integer table (nonzero only on a short list of patterns such as $(0,0,1,1,2,2)\mapsto 4$ and $(0,0,1,2,1,2)\mapsto -2$). The module doc frames chunk 13 as part of the 256 kernel decides that discharge the identity casewise.

Upstream, both definitions live in the kernel-cert module; downstream assembly will quantify over all index sextuples.

proof idea

One-line computational proof: by decide. Lean evaluates both sides at the concrete Fin-4 sextuple $(3,1,3,2,1,0)$ (the fold for the numerator and the matching clause or default of the explicit kernel) and checks integer equality. No lemmas are invoked beyond the decidable equality instance on Int.

why it matters

Parent theorem is m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,; N_{M_2}=8Z$ and proves it by exhaustive fin_cases on all six indices. Each chunk theorem such as this one supplies one leaf of that case tree.

In the Recognition gravity stack this identity is bookkeeping for the exact midpoint M2–TT relation in 4D Regge analysis: it converts a summed coupling expression into a sparse explicit kernel, so later curvature and continuum-limit arguments can quote a closed integer table rather than a fold. It does not itself touch T0–T8 or the J-cost forcing chain; it is infrastructure inside the gravity analysis layer.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.