Pith. sign in
theorem

e_323201

proved
show as:
module
IndisputableMonolith.Gravity.Analysis.ReggeExactMidpointM2TTIdentity4DM2NumChunk14
domain
Gravity
line
242 · github
papers citing
none yet

plain-language theorem explainer

Pointwise identity: the midpoint Regge m₂ numerator at multi-index (3,2,3,2,0,1) equals eight times the explicit Z-table entry. Gravity analysts cite it inside the exhaustive Fin-4 assembly that m₂Num = 8·explicitZ everywhere. The proof is a single kernel decide on concrete integers.

Claim. For indices $(a,b,c,d,i,j)=(3,2,3,2,0,1)$ in $(\mathrm{Fin}\,4)^6$, the folded coupling numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}(a,b,c,d,i,j)$ equals $8$ times the explicit integer table value $Z(a,b,c,d,i,j)$.

background

In the 4D Regge midpoint analysis, two integer-valued kernels on six Fin-4 indices are compared. The numerator $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$ is the fold of a fixed coupling list: each term contributes an integer via a local weight, and the fold starts at 0. The companion table $Z$ is an explicit pattern-matched function on the same six indices, returning small integers (e.g. $\pm 2,4$) on the nonzero support and (by default) zero elsewhere.

This module is chunk 14 of the 256-way kernel split that discharges $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8Z$ by concrete decision at each multi-index. The local setting is pure integer arithmetic on Fin-4 labels; no continuum limit or metric signature is invoked here.

proof idea

One-line computational proof: decide evaluates both sides at the fixed indices $(3,2,3,2,0,1)$. The left side runs the fold that defines $m_2^{\mathrm{num}}$; the right side looks up $8\cdot Z$ in the explicit table. Both reduce to the same Int, so the equality is closed by the kernel decision procedure. No lemmas beyond the two definitions are required.

why it matters

Feeds the parent assembly theorem m2Num_eq_eight_explicitZ, which states $\forall a,b,c,d,i,j,, m_2^{\mathrm{num}}=8Z$ and proves it by six nested fin_cases sweeps. Each concrete residue class (including this $(3,2,3,2,0,1)$ cell) is discharged by a chunk decide of this form. Closing the pointwise table is a bookkeeping step toward the exact midpoint $M_2$ TT identity in 4D Regge calculus used in the Gravity analysis stack; it does not itself touch the T0–T8 forcing chain or the Recognition Composition Law.

Switch to Lean above to see the machine-checked source, dependencies, and usage graph.