pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in
theorem proved tactic proof high

mu_pred_lower

show as:
view Lean formalization →

The theorem proves that the phi-ladder prediction for the proton-electron mass ratio exceeds 1898. Recognition Science mass modelers cite this lower bound when constructing the bracketed interval for the dimensionless ratio against CODATA data. The proof unfolds the ratio definition, applies the positivity lemma for the electron prediction to convert to a product inequality, bounds the product below 969 using the supplied mass intervals, and closes the chain with linarith.

claim$1898 < m_p^pred / m_e^pred$, where $m_e^pred = phi^{59}/4194304000000$ MeV lies in $(0.5098, 0.5102)$ and $m_p^pred = phi^{43}/1000000$ MeV lies in $(969, 970.4)$.

background

The module records proved interval bounds on the predicted proton-electron mass ratio in the phi-ladder framework of Recognition Science. The ratio is defined as proton_binding_pred divided by electron_pred, with electron_pred = phi^59 / 4194304000000 and proton_binding_pred = phi^43 / 1000000. Upstream theorems supply the tight intervals electron_mass_bounds and proton_mass_bounds together with the positivity lemma electron_pred_pos.

proof idea

The proof unfolds mu_pred and invokes electron_pred_pos to rewrite the target inequality as 1898 * electron_pred < proton_binding_pred. It applies the upper bound from electron_mass_bounds to obtain 1898 * electron_pred < 1898 * 0.5102, shows the right-hand side is less than 969 by norm_num, and combines with the lower bound from proton_mass_bounds via linarith.

why it matters in Recognition Science

This lower bound is paired with mu_pred_upper inside the downstream theorem mu_pred_bracket to produce the full interval (1898, 1904). The module compares the resulting prediction to the CODATA value 1836.15 and notes the 4 percent deviation arising from the proton sitting between phi-ladder rungs 47 and 48. It fills the Phase 0 row P0-MU of the physical derivation plan and supports the mass formula yardstick * phi^(rung - 8 + gap(Z)).

scope and limits

Lean usage

theorem mu_pred_bracket : (1898 : ℝ) < mu_pred ∧ mu_pred < (1904 : ℝ) := ⟨mu_pred_lower, mu_pred_upper⟩

formal statement (Lean)

  70theorem mu_pred_lower : (1898 : ℝ) < mu_pred := by

proof body

Tactic-mode proof.

  71  unfold mu_pred
  72  have he_pos : 0 < electron_pred := electron_pred_pos
  73  rw [lt_div_iff₀ he_pos]
  74  -- want: 1898 * electron_pred < proton_binding_pred
  75  have he_hi : electron_pred < (0.5102 : ℝ) := electron_mass_bounds.2
  76  have hp_lo : (969 : ℝ) < proton_binding_pred := proton_mass_bounds.1
  77  -- 1898 * electron_pred < 1898 * 0.5102 = 968.3596 < 969 < proton_binding_pred
  78  have step1 : (1898 : ℝ) * electron_pred < (1898 : ℝ) * (0.5102 : ℝ) := by
  79    have h1898 : (0 : ℝ) < 1898 := by norm_num
  80    exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left he_hi h1898
  81  have step2 : (1898 : ℝ) * (0.5102 : ℝ) < (969 : ℝ) := by norm_num
  82  linarith
  83

used by (1)

From the project-wide theorem graph. These declarations reference this one in their body.

depends on (6)

Lean names referenced from this declaration's body.