that
The phi-ladder Poisson summation hypothesis states that the lattice sum of a rapidly decreasing f over integer multiples of log φ equals the scaled dual sum of its Fourier transform. Researchers deriving continuum limits from discrete phi-rungs in Recognition Science cite the packaged Prop when they need the identity for lattice sums. The declaration is a structure definition with no proof body that simply records the statement for later discharge.
claimLet $f : ℝ → ℝ$ be rapidly decreasing. Then $∑_{r ∈ ℤ} f(r log φ) = (1 / log φ) ∑_{m ∈ ℤ} ˆf(2π m / log φ)$, where ˆf is the Fourier transform. The identity is the standard Poisson summation formula applied to the lattice Λ_φ = (log φ) ℤ whose dual is Λ_φ* = (2π / log φ) ℤ.
background
The phi-ladder is the geometric sequence φ^r for r ∈ ℤ forced by self-similarity (T6). On the log scale t = log x it becomes the additive lattice r log φ, which admits Poisson summation because it is a true lattice in ℝ. The module records the basic facts phi_pos, log_phi_pos, phiLatticeReciprocal_involutive and phiRung_recip that establish the lattice and its reciprocal symmetry x ↦ 1/x.
proof idea
This is a structure definition that packages the Poisson summation statement as a Prop. It contains no proof body and functions as a hypothesis interface to be assumed until the required Fourier-analytic infrastructure is available.
why it matters in Recognition Science
The structure records Sub-conjecture A.2, supplying the analytic bridge between discrete phi-ladder sums and their Fourier duals. Downstream results in Action.EulerLagrange and Action.FunctionalConvexity rely on the lattice symmetries it encodes when proving rigidity and convexity of the J-action. It marks the precise point where the formalization awaits discharge of the Poisson identity via mathlib Fourier tools.
scope and limits
- Does not prove the Poisson summation identity.
- Does not specify the exact function class beyond rapid decrease.
- Does not derive physical observables from the lattice sum without further hypotheses.
- Does not connect the dual lattice to any particular physical measurement.
formal statement (Lean)
192structure that can be assumed in downstream theorems and discharged
193when the analytic infrastructure becomes available. -/
194
195/-- Hypothesis structure: phi-ladder Poisson summation.
196
197If `f : ℝ → ℝ` is rapidly decreasing and we form the lattice sum
198`Σ_{r ∈ ℤ} f(r · log φ)`, the Poisson identity states this equals
199`(1/log φ) · Σ_{m ∈ ℤ} f̂(2π m / log φ)` where `f̂` is the Fourier
200transform. This is a special case of standard Poisson summation
201on `ℝ` for the lattice `Λ_φ = (log φ) · ℤ` with dual lattice
202`Λ_φ* = (2π/log φ) · ℤ`.
203
204We package the statement as a Prop. -/
used by (40)
-
costRateEL_implies_const_one -
actionJ_convex_on_interp -
actionJ_minimum_unique_value -
fixedEndpoints_trans -
newton_first_law -
standardEL -
WallpaperGroup -
Jphi_numerical_band -
cost_algebra_unique_aczel -
two_mul_inv_ne_inv_two_mul -
weight_zero_iff -
antisymmetric_implies_balance -
GradedLedger -
semanticsDomain -
octave_loop_neutrality -
resonant_minimization -
moonMassRatioInBand -
AllConstantsDerived -
OptimalConfig -
ml_is_phi_power' -
alphaInv_dimensionless -
alphaInv_gauge_invariant -
PhysicalCertificate -
RealCertificate -
hcp_ratio_near_phi -
prefersBCC -
prefersFCC -
stability_tradeoff -
transition_cohesive_gt_alkali -
window8Sum