theorem
proved
term proof
alpha_s_two_loop_pos_when_denom_pos
show as:
view Lean formalization →
formal statement (Lean)
92theorem alpha_s_two_loop_pos_when_denom_pos
93 (alpha_0 : ℝ) (N_f : ℕ) (mu_GeV mu_0_GeV : ℝ)
94 (h_alpha_pos : 0 < alpha_0)
95 (h_denom_pos : 0 < 1 + b0 N_f * alpha_0 * Real.log (mu_GeV ^ 2 / mu_0_GeV ^ 2) +
96 (b1 N_f / b0 N_f) * alpha_0 *
97 Real.log (1 + b0 N_f * alpha_0 * Real.log (mu_GeV ^ 2 / mu_0_GeV ^ 2))) :
98 0 < alpha_s_two_loop alpha_0 N_f mu_GeV mu_0_GeV := by
proof body
Term-mode proof.
99 unfold alpha_s_two_loop
100 exact div_pos h_alpha_pos h_denom_pos
101
102/-! ## At-Z bracket sanity check
103
104The PDG value `alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.1179 +- 0.0009`. The RS prediction is
105`alpha_s_geom = 2/17 ≈ 0.11765`, sitting inside the PDG bracket. The two-loop
106formula, evaluated at mu_0 = M_Z = mu, returns alpha_0 exactly (the log
107vanishes), so the two-loop framework is self-consistent at the anchor scale.
108-/
109
110/-- At `mu = mu_0`, the running coupling equals the input coupling. -/